Skip to content

Standardize TinyNode route contract across consumers (/app/* vs root) #118

Description

@cubap

During contract-seam scanning across CDH repos, I found a route-shape mismatch risk across TinyNode consumers:

  • deer uses /app/create, /app/query, /app/update, /app/overwrite
  • TPEN-services appears to use root routes /create, /query, /update, /overwrite, /delete

Recommended adjustment:

  1. Document canonical TinyNode API surface and supported aliases.
  2. Publish OpenAPI for TinyNode routes (including /app/* and root aliases if both are supported).
  3. Add compatibility tests ensuring both consumer patterns continue to work, or explicitly deprecate one pattern with migration guidance.

Why this matters:

  • Divergent route prefixes/method expectations increase break risk across consumers.

Filed by automation as requested; label: copilot.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    copilotFiled by Copilot scan

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions