Suggestion to adjust license wording for consistency with standard BSD-style phrasing

[wjjahah]

Hello NVIDIA team,

I was reviewing the LICENSE file for nccl-tests and noticed a slight deviation in the wording regarding endorsement:

The current wording in LICENSE.txt is:

Neither the name of NVIDIA CORPORATION, nor the names of their contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.

Reference:
https://github.com/NVIDIA/nccl-tests/blob/master/LICENSE.txt#L12-L14

Standard BSD-style wording:
Neither the name of the copyright holder nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.

The current phrasing explicitly mentions “NVIDIA CORPORATION,” whereas the standard formulation refers to “the copyright holder.” Using the standard wording could help align the license with common BSD-style licenses and avoid potential ambiguity in interpretation.

Thank you for considering this suggestion.

[AddyLaddy]

Thanks for your report.
SPDX explicitly recognizes equivalent BSD-3-Clause variations in the third clause: SPDX BSD-3-Clause

Note for matching purposes, this license contains a number of equivalent variations, particularly in the third clause. See the XML file for more details.

So I don't believe it necessary to change the current LICENSE.txt in nccl-tests in order to meet the SPDX rules.

We may review this later if our Legal team want to carry out a more conistent change across all Nvidia Open-Source products.