Option to store/load covertchannel payloads

[nieldk]

I believe it would be fairly simple to change the code for coveetchannel payloads (sharplocker atm is ‘hardcoded’.
Since the payload is executed by a simple powershell base64 encoded string, we could change the function to add options for loading/storing the base64 string, similar to when devices are added/stored.
Practically, that would make LOGITacker an advanced Rubberducky.
I will look into that, if no one do before me ;)

[SymbianSyMoh]

@nieldk The problem is that you are limited by the flash size of the LOGITacker supported device. Anyways, Covertchannel is just a normal script payload, and using script command functions would do the job.

[RoganDawes]

Normal, apart from the number of lines in the payload ... Marcus explained on Twitter a number of issues with the proposal, that need to be carefully considered. I do wonder, though, if it is possible to change the flash allocation map to make more flash pages available for storage, at the cost of program space?

…

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 22:29 Mohamed A. Baset ***@***.***> wrote: @nieldk <https://github.com/nieldk> The problem is that you are limited by the flash size of the LOGITacker supported device. Anyways, Covertchannel is just a normal script payload, and using script command functions would do the job. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#54?email_source=notifications&email_token=AABHBC5ELNJFEY6LHBNGCKLRG2PKJA5CNFSM4LFCK6V2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEONA3TY#issuecomment-597298639>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABHBCZ5LTR4ZSUY7UBGXITRG2PKJANCNFSM4LFCK6VQ> .