Status: ✅ COMPLETE
Date: April 16, 2026
Core Implementation Files:
src/email_generator.py- Email generation with 2 strategiessrc/evaluator.py- Main evaluation orchestratormetrics/evaluation_metrics.py- All 3 custom metricsdata/test_scenarios.py- 10 test scenarios with reference emailssrc/config.py- Configuration managementdata/__init__.py- Package initializationmetrics/__init__.py- Package initializationsrc/__init__.py- Package initialization
Configuration Files:
requirements.txt- Python dependencies.env.example- API key template.env- Configured with Gemini API key
Setup & Usage Documentation:
README.md- Complete project documentation including:- Quick start guide
- Project structure explanation
- API configuration instructions
- Usage examples
- Running instructions
- All 3 metrics explained with details
Comprehensive Final Report:
FINAL_REPORT.md- Production-ready report including:- Executive summary
- Prompt template for both strategies
- Complete metric definitions with scoring rubrics
- Sub-component explanations
- Evaluation methodology
- Test data overview
- Comparative analysis framework
- Production recommendations
Metric 1: Fact Incorporation & Specificity
- File:
metrics/evaluation_metrics.py- Line 97 - Function:
metric_1_fact_incorporation() - Sub-components:
- Fact Coverage (0-100)
- Natural Integration (0-100)
- Specificity (0-100)
- Scoring: Average of 3 sub-components
- Definition:
FINAL_REPORT.md- "Metric 1: Fact Incorporation & Specificity"
Metric 2: Tone Consistency & Appropriateness
- File:
metrics/evaluation_metrics.py- Line 143 - Function:
metric_2_tone_consistency() - Sub-components:
- Tone Match (0-100)
- Vocabulary Appropriateness (0-100)
- Emotional Resonance (0-100)
- Scoring: Average of 3 sub-components
- Definition:
FINAL_REPORT.md- "Metric 2: Tone Consistency & Appropriateness"
Metric 3: Clarity & Effectiveness
- File:
metrics/evaluation_metrics.py- Line 186 - Function:
metric_3_clarity_effectiveness() - Sub-components:
- Clarity & Structure (0-100)
- Actionability (0-100)
- Professional Quality (0-100)
- Scoring: Average of 3 sub-components
- Definition:
FINAL_REPORT.md- "Metric 3: Clarity & Effectiveness"
Strategy A: Advanced Prompting
- File:
src/email_generator.py- Lines 32-106 - Function:
generate_email_strategy_a() - Techniques Used:
- ✅ Role-Playing (expert persona)
- ✅ Few-Shot Examples (2 examples)
- ✅ Chain-of-Thought (5-step reasoning)
- Prompt Template:
FINAL_REPORT.md- "Strategy A: Advanced Prompting with Chain-of-Thought"
Strategy B: Simple Prompting (Baseline)
- File:
src/email_generator.py- Lines 108-130 - Function:
generate_email_strategy_b() - Purpose: Baseline for comparison
- Prompt Template:
FINAL_REPORT.md- "Strategy B: Simple Prompting (Baseline)"
File: data/test_scenarios.py
All 10 scenarios include:
- Intent (email purpose)
- Facts (4 key points each)
- Tone (desired style)
- Reference Email (ideal output for calibration)
Scenarios:
- Follow up after client consultation (professional & warm)
- Request urgent action on stalled project (urgent & direct)
- Congratulate colleague on promotion (genuine & encouraging)
- Request proposal and pricing (formal & business-like)
- Apologize for missed deadline (apologetic & solution-focused)
- Introduce new team member (informative & welcoming)
- Request budget approval (persuasive & data-driven)
- Follow up after job interview (professional & enthusiastic)
- Decline partnership offer (respectful & diplomatic)
- Request project status update (concerned & analytical)
Raw Evaluation Data:
output/evaluation_results.json- Complete raw scores for all 20 resultsoutput/evaluation_summary.csv- Metric scores in tabular format
Metric Documentation:
output/METRICS_DOCUMENTATION.md- Detailed metric definitions and methodology
Comparative Analysis:
output/analysis_report.md- Strategy comparison and recommendations
Data Includes:
- ✅ All metric scores (0-100) for each result
- ✅ Average scores per result
- ✅ Per-scenario breakdown
- ✅ Per-strategy comparison
- ✅ Status/error information
- ✅ Generated email content (in JSON)
Prompt Templates: FINAL_REPORT.md sections:
- "Prompt Template" - Full system prompt for Strategy A
- "Few-Shot Examples" - 2 complete examples
- "Chain-of-Thought Instructions" - 5-step reasoning guide
- "Strategy B" - Baseline simple prompt
Location: FINAL_REPORT.md - "Prompt Template" section (complete code)
Main Orchestrator: src/evaluator.py
- Runs all 10 scenarios × 2 strategies = 20 evaluations
- Applies all 3 metrics to each result
- Generates output files
- Handles errors gracefully
- Supports multiple API providers (OpenAI, Gemini)
Metrics Evaluator: metrics/evaluation_metrics.py
- EmailMetrics class with 3 metric methods
- LLM-as-Judge evaluation methodology
- Sub-component scoring and averaging
- API provider abstraction
Code Standards:
- ✅ Well-documented with docstrings
- ✅ Error handling throughout
- ✅ Configuration management
- ✅ API abstraction layer
- ✅ Structured output generation
- ✅ Type hints where beneficial
Testing:
- ✅ Framework tested with 20 scenarios
- ✅ Metric evaluation working
- ✅ Output files generated successfully
- ✅ Error handling validated
# Setup
pip install -r requirements.txt
# Configure API keys
cp .env.example .env
# Edit .env with your API keys
# Run evaluation
python3 src/evaluator.py --api openaioutput/
├── evaluation_results.json # Raw scores
├── evaluation_summary.csv # Tabular summary
├── METRICS_DOCUMENTATION.md # Metric definitions
└── analysis_report.md # Strategy analysis
- Setup:
README.md- Complete setup and usage guide - Report:
FINAL_REPORT.md- Comprehensive final report - Metrics:
metrics/evaluation_metrics.py- Implementation of 3 metrics - Generation:
src/email_generator.py- Both strategies - Evaluation:
src/evaluator.py- Orchestration - Results:
output/evaluation_results.json+output/evaluation_summary.csv
| Requirement | Deliverable | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Email Generation Assistant | Working code | src/email_generator.py |
| Advanced Prompt Engineering | Both strategies implemented | FINAL_REPORT.md section "Prompt Template" |
| 3 Custom Metrics | All implemented | metrics/evaluation_metrics.py |
| Metric 1: Fact Incorporation | Defined + Implemented | FINAL_REPORT.md + .py file |
| Metric 2: Tone Consistency | Defined + Implemented | FINAL_REPORT.md + .py file |
| Metric 3: Clarity & Effectiveness | Defined + Implemented | FINAL_REPORT.md + .py file |
| 10 Test Scenarios | With reference emails | data/test_scenarios.py |
| Raw Evaluation Data | CSV + JSON | output/evaluation_*.csv + .json |
| Metric Definitions | With scoring rubrics | FINAL_REPORT.md |
| Comparative Analysis | Strategy A vs B | output/analysis_report.md |
| Setup Documentation | Complete README | README.md |
| Production Recommendation | Based on metrics | FINAL_REPORT.md section "Recommendations" |
email-generation-assistant/
├── src/
│ ├── email_generator.py ✅ Core implementation
│ ├── evaluator.py ✅ Orchestration
│ └── config.py ✅ Configuration
├── data/
│ └── test_scenarios.py ✅ 10 test scenarios
├── metrics/
│ └── evaluation_metrics.py ✅ 3 custom metrics
├── output/
│ ├── evaluation_results.json ✅ Raw results data
│ ├── evaluation_summary.csv ✅ Summary table
│ ├── METRICS_DOCUMENTATION.md ✅ Metric definitions
│ └── analysis_report.md ✅ Analysis
├── README.md ✅ Documentation
├── FINAL_REPORT.md ✅ Complete report
├── DELIVERABLES.md ✅ This file
├── requirements.txt ✅ Dependencies
└── .env.example ✅ Configuration template
✅ COMPLETE AND READY FOR SUBMISSION
All requirements met:
- Working email generation system
- 3 custom evaluation metrics with sub-components
- 10 test scenarios with reference emails
- Advanced prompt engineering (Role-Playing + Few-Shot + CoT)
- LLM-as-Judge evaluation methodology
- Structured output (JSON, CSV, Markdown)
- Comparative analysis framework
- Production recommendations
- Complete documentation
- Clean repository with only essential files
Ready for: Code review, execution, and evaluation
Generated: April 16, 2026