diff --git a/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/blueprint_proposal.yml b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/blueprint_proposal.yml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8578e70 --- /dev/null +++ b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/blueprint_proposal.yml @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +name: Blueprint Proposal +description: Propose a new evaluation blueprint +labels: ["enhancement"] +body: + - type: textarea + id: topic + attributes: + label: Domain / topic + description: What area should the blueprint evaluate? + validations: + required: true + + - type: textarea + id: why + attributes: + label: Why it matters + description: Why is this evaluation important for the community? + validations: + required: true + + - type: textarea + id: models + attributes: + label: Target models + description: Which models should be tested, if known? + validations: + required: false + + - type: textarea + id: rubric + attributes: + label: Draft points / rubric + description: Sketch the scoring criteria and expected decision points. + validations: + required: false + + - type: textarea + id: sources + attributes: + label: Links and sources + description: Supporting evidence, references, or example cases. + validations: + required: false + + - type: markdown + attributes: + value: | + Before proposing, review [docs/BLUEPRINT_FORMAT.md](../../docs/BLUEPRINT_FORMAT.md). diff --git a/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..15bdde5 --- /dev/null +++ b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +name: Feature Request +description: Propose an enhancement for Weval +labels: ["enhancement"] +body: + - type: textarea + id: problem + attributes: + label: Problem + description: What problem are you trying to solve? + validations: + required: true + + - type: textarea + id: solution + attributes: + label: Proposed solution + description: What should the feature do, and where should it live? + validations: + required: true + + - type: textarea + id: alternatives + attributes: + label: Alternatives considered + description: What other approaches did you consider? + validations: + required: false + + - type: textarea + id: scope + attributes: + label: Scope + description: Who benefits, and what is explicitly out of scope? + validations: + required: false