Repository navigation
chore(license): split code (MIT) from content (CC BY 4.0) - #8
Conversation
MIT on prose is a category error: it speaks about "the Software", warranty and liability, and says nothing useful about how documentation may be quoted, translated or reused. It also appeared to cover the logos and brand assets under public/, which it should not. Splits the repo three ways: - Software (Next.js app, @acta-team/docs-mcp, scripts, config) stays MIT - Documentation content moves to CC BY 4.0 in LICENSE-DOCS - ACTA name, logo and brand assets are reserved under neither Also unifies the copyright line to "2024-2026 ACTA".
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 59 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
MIT on prose is a category error: it speaks about "the Software", warranty and
liability, and says nothing useful about how documentation may be quoted,
translated or reused. It also appeared to cover the logos and brand assets
under public/, which it should not.
Splits the repo three ways:
Also unifies the copyright line to "2024-2026 ACTA".