Skip to content

docs: route Cherry Studio into integrations - #84

Open
acedatacloud-dev wants to merge 1 commit into
docs/publish-open-webui-guidefrom
docs/publish-cherry-studio-guide
Open

docs: route Cherry Studio into integrations#84
acedatacloud-dev wants to merge 1 commit into
docs/publish-open-webui-guidefrom
docs/publish-cherry-studio-guide

Conversation

@acedatacloud-dev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Dependency

This PR is stacked on #83, which introduces the safe integrations document-only namespace. This relative diff adds only Cherry Studio.

Why

PlatformBackend already contains a substantial Cherry Studio guide covering custom-provider URL semantics, model-family endpoints, image generation, token setup, usage history, limitations, and troubleshooting. The Docs generator cannot currently assign that platform-level document to a stable integration path, so the content remains outside the Docs tree.

What changed

  • map development_cherry_studio to guides/integrations/cherry-studio.mdx;
  • preserve development_cherry_studio as the canonical platform document alias;
  • add a focused assertion for namespace, output path, and canonical alias.

Validation

  • Docs sync tests — 32/32 passed
  • exact-map JSON parse — passed
  • relative diff against docs/publish-open-webui-guide — 2 files, 15 lines
  • git diff --check — clean

Generation / rollout

After the base and this PR merge, the protected Docs sync generates localized MDX from PlatformBackend and the Translation API. Generated files are intentionally not hand-edited here. Navigation follows only after generated files exist.

Scope boundaries

This PR adds only the Cherry Studio record. It does not modify the guide, generated MDX, Open WebUI, LobeChat, platform APIs, or client behavior.

Rollback

Revert this mapping commit; the source guide remains in PlatformBackend.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant