Skip to content

Update Sentinel cost workbook - #15020

Closed
Dr Bill Mcilhargey (billmcilhargey) wants to merge 1 commit into
Azure:masterfrom
billmcilhargey:feat-sentinel-cost-wkb-pr-only
Closed

Dr Bill Mcilhargey (billmcilhargey) wants to merge 1 commit into
Azure:masterfrom
billmcilhargey:feat-sentinel-cost-wkb-pr-only

Conversation

@billmcilhargey

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Update the SOC Handbook AzureSentinelCost workbook with reorganized cost sections and updated benefit guidance.
  • Expand the Defender for Servers Plan 2 eligible data-source description to mirror the Microsoft 365 benefit section style.
  • Add the SOC Handbook release note for the packaged workbook enhancements.

Scope

This PR intentionally includes only:

  • Solutions/SOC Handbook/Workbooks/AzureSentinelCost.json
  • Solutions/SOC Handbook/ReleaseNotes.md

Other JSON changes from the source branch are excluded.

Validation

  • Parsed Solutions/SOC Handbook/Workbooks/AzureSentinelCost.json as JSON successfully.
  • Verified the branch diff against master contains only the two scoped files.
  • Ran git diff --check on the scoped files successfully.

@billmcilhargey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Superseded by #14998. Its scoped SOC Handbook workbook and release-note content was already identical in #14998; the complete #15020 summary, scope, and validation record have been retained in #14998.

@billmcilhargey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Follow-up: this superseded PR remains closed. The consolidated contribution and reviewer corrections from #14998 now continue in #15452, because GitHub rejected reopening the original. The replacement includes generated V3 package outputs, synchronized solution/package version 3.0.9, workbook metadata 1.6.0, and corrected scope documentation. It explicitly remains a draft pending genuine deployment/screenshot evidence and the reproduced upstream ARM-TTK blocker; review is requested there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Solution Solution specialty review needed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants