Add support for the Delos (Germany) & GovSG (Singapore ) sovereign clouds

[ohadschn]

Preconditions

• No need to upgrade Python SDK or the Python SDK is ready.

Related command

az cloud set

Resource Provider

N/A

Description of Feature or Work Requested

CloudNameEnum currently contains:

• AzureCloud: public cloud
• AzureChinaCloud: Mooncake national cloud
• AzureUSGovernment: Fairfax national cloud)
• AzureGermanCloud: Blackforest national cloud (deprecated)
• AzureBleuCloud: France sovereign cloud

azure-cli/src/azure-cli-core/azure/cli/core/cloud.py

Line 353 in 9a3432d

class CloudNameEnum: # pylint: disable=too-few-public-methods

It is currently missing the other 2 sovereign clouds:

• AzureDelosCloud: Germany sovereign cloud
• AzureGovSgCloud: Singapore sovereign cloud

When you add it, please make sure to include all applicable endpoints/suffixes and resource IDs (see #34059)

Minimum API Version Required

N/A

Swagger PR link / SDK link

N/A

Request Example

No response

Target Date

N/A

PM Contact

ohads

Engineer Contact

ohads

Additional context

This will simplify various critical internal efforts

[yonzhan]

Thank you for opening this issue, we will look into it.

[x-engineering-agent]

Hi Ohad Schneider (@ohadschn), thanks! The az cloud set request, both cloud names, and SDK-readiness confirmation are clear. This is a feature request, not a reproduced bug.

To assess implementation readiness, could you provide these missing details?

• Publicly shareable, authoritative configuration or metadata for each cloud: supported endpoints, suffixes, and resource/audience IDs, with unsupported entries identified.
• Supported availability/access prerequisites and a minimal acceptance example for each cloud: CLI version, validation commands, and expected results. A failure log is not required.

Template (repeat for each cloud):

Cloud: AzureDelosCloud / AzureGovSgCloud
Authoritative configuration: <public reference or configuration>
Availability/prerequisites: <non-sensitive details>
CLI version: <version>
Validation commands: <cloud selection and a supported operation>
Expected results: <sanitized results>

Please omit credentials and private tenant/subscription or infrastructure details. This issue will be picked up automatically once you reply with the details.

[ohadschn]

Hi Ohad Schneider (@ohadschn), thanks! The az cloud set request, both cloud names, and SDK-readiness confirmation are clear. This is a feature request, not a reproduced bug.

To assess implementation readiness, could you provide these missing details?

• Publicly shareable, authoritative configuration or metadata for each cloud: supported endpoints, suffixes, and resource/audience IDs, with unsupported entries identified.[ ] Supported availability/access prerequisites and a minimal acceptance example for each cloud: CLI version, validation commands, and expected results. A failure log is not required.

Template (repeat for each cloud):

Cloud: AzureDelosCloud / AzureGovSgCloud
Authoritative configuration: <public reference or configuration>
Availability/prerequisites: <non-sensitive details>
CLI version: <version>
Validation commands: <cloud selection and a supported operation>
Expected results: <sanitized results>

Please omit credentials and private tenant/subscription or infrastructure details. This issue will be picked up automatically once you reply with the details.

Yong Zhang (@yonzhan) Surely you don't need me to provide this info? Whatever process you used to get the details for the existing Bleu cloud, do the same for Delos and GovSG...

[x-engineering-agent]

Hi Ohad Schneider (@ohadschn), understood: this is cloud onboarding, not a bug reproducer. The az cloud set command, both requested cloud names, desired endpoint/suffix/audience coverage, and SDK readiness are clear. Your reply identifies Bleu as the precedent.

I checked the current cloud definitions: Bleu has explicit configuration, but neither requested cloud is defined there. Its structure alone cannot establish their cloud-specific values.

The remaining input can come from maintainers/cloud owners; you do not need to compile the values yourself:

• For each cloud, provide an authoritative, publicly shareable configuration/metadata source covering endpoints, suffixes and resource/audience IDs, with unavailable services and access prerequisites identified.

A short reply is sufficient:

Cloud:
Authoritative public configuration:
Unavailable services / access prerequisites:

No failure logs, CLI version, or repeat description are needed for this feature request. This will be picked up automatically once the remaining details are supplied.

[x-engineering-agent]

Hi Ohad Schneider (@ohadschn), a brief follow-up on the remaining cloud-onboarding details. The scope, SDK readiness, and Bleu precedent are already clear.

Could maintainers or the cloud owners share an authoritative public configuration/metadata source for each of AzureDelosCloud and AzureGovSgCloud, covering endpoints, suffixes, resource/audience IDs, unavailable services, and access prerequisites?

You do not need to compile these values yourself; no failure logs or CLI version are needed. Please omit credentials and private infrastructure details. We'll pick this up automatically once the remaining information is supplied.