Skip to content

Resolve FoliaLib before the failing Velocity repository - #1733

Merged
BenCodez merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/folialib-official-repository
Oct 19, 2026
Merged

BenCodez merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/folialib-official-repository

Conversation

@BenCodez

@BenCodez BenCodez commented Oct 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Jenkins #2450 stops before compilation while resolving the FoliaLib 0.5.1 POM from the Velocity repository, which returns HTTP 522. Add FoliaLib’s documented official release repository before Velocity, with snapshots disabled. Existing repositories and dependency versions remain unchanged.

Maven can retain an earlier “not found” result even after a repository becomes healthy. A controlled Maven 3.9.11 regression using the project POM reproduces the observed sequence: after seeding a missing POM, the original POM without -U queries only Velocity and fails; -U permits resolution from Nexus. The updated POM resolves the genuine official POM/JAR without -U from both that restored cache and a cold FoliaLib cache, making zero requests to Velocity for FoliaLib.

The official and Nexus JAR containers have different hashes, but all 31 ZIP entries have identical names and uncompressed contents. The previously validated Java fixture changes are untouched. git diff --check passes. An isolated offline package build passed with the full Java suite skipped, followed by all five packaged-artifact tests passing against the fresh JAR. Previous unchanged Java test evidence is reused; no fresh full-suite run or deployment was performed. Jenkins’s actual cache was not inspected; the cached-miss scenario is a reproduced explanation, not a claim about verified server state.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added access to an additional release repository for build dependencies.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-19T09:25:30.524009Z 6ff81d7 PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-19T09:28:49.678220Z 6ff81d7 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review in Change Stack →

Note

Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait...

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 4151dd52-f30a-45ab-a330-0d42bcf34e92
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0554c2b and 6ff81d7.

📒 Files selected for processing: 1
  • VotingPlugin/pom.xml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@BenCodez
BenCodez merged commit 8c098ed into master Oct 19, 2026
5 of 6 checks passed
@BenCodez
BenCodez deleted the fix/folialib-official-repository branch October 19, 2026 21:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant