Skip to content

Benchmark Jev with and without DSPy across repeated searches and calibration - #28

Merged
CompleteDotTech merged 14 commits into
mainfrom
study/dspy-calibration-benchmark
Sep 28, 2026
Merged

CompleteDotTech merged 14 commits into
mainfrom
study/dspy-calibration-benchmark

Conversation

@CompleteDotTech

@CompleteDotTech CompleteDotTech commented Sep 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Scope

This first branch of the DSPy benchmark stack adds the frozen v2 protocol, primary search and calibration harnesses, independent audit code, and focused tests. It preserves the historical live captures for the downstream offline audit and publication in #29 and #30.

The first primary run 35342763186 had four failed entity jobs, so it did not establish full coverage. The completion run 35345560822 supplied the missing captures. Its hosted analysis then failed on a numerical near-tie; #29 repairs the independent analysis using those existing bytes. Together the preserved captures support eight formulations and 40 actual DSPy searches (five per formulation). No new model calls were made in this remediation.

All new workflows are manual-only; paid inference jobs in this branch have an unsatisfied authorization condition. The separate #32 comparison package, manual workflows, optimizer inventory, and #33 structural study remain integrated.

Full measured results and durable raw journals arrive in #30. The original frozen research inventory remains unchanged.

@CompleteDotTech CompleteDotTech added reproducibility Reproduction commands, pinned inputs, and verification priority: high Blocks a reliable public release or core reproduction path labels Sep 28, 2026
@CompleteDotTech
CompleteDotTech marked this pull request as ready for review September 28, 2026 19:31
@CompleteDotTech
CompleteDotTech merged commit 7794a00 into main Sep 28, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-28T19:32:34.505450Z 48a10e9 Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-28T19:33:13.469957Z 48a10e9 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

priority: high Blocks a reliable public release or core reproduction path reproducibility Reproduction commands, pinned inputs, and verification

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant