Is there a reason why this internal objects are named ce_df or ice_df instead of df_ce and df_ice ? Is there concern of a conflict with objects in the broader environment? If not, I think we should continue to use darth naming conventions.
|
ce_df <- data.frame("Strategy" = df_cost$Strategy, |
|
ice_df <- data.frame("Strategy" = df_inc_cost$Strategy, |
Is there a reason why this internal objects are named
ce_dforice_dfinstead ofdf_ceanddf_ice? Is there concern of a conflict with objects in the broader environment? If not, I think we should continue to use darth naming conventions.dampack/R/psa.R
Line 183 in c3300ae
dampack/R/psa.R
Line 259 in c3300ae