count_trials doesn't infer responses from accuracy #106

New issue

Copy link

New issue

Copy link

Closed

Bug

#108

Closed

count_trials doesn't infer responses from accuracy#106

Bug

#108

Copy link

Description

Ver0Ha

opened on Nov 2, 2026

Issue body actions

count_trials doesn't infer responses from accuracy, contrary to what's stated in the function's docstring.

count_trials:

cpm/cpm/utils/metad.py

Line 4 in ecfa900

def count_trials(

specific docstring line:

cpm/cpm/utils/metad.py

Lines 65 to 67 in ecfa900

	The inputs can be responses, accuracy or both. If both `responses` and
	`accuracy` are provided, will check for consstency. If only `accuracy` is
	provided, the responses vector will be automatically infered.

👍React with 👍1Reacted by Lenard Dome

Activity

1. Ver0Ha

   added the

   Bug

   issue type on Nov 2, 2026
2. lenarddome

   added 3 commits that reference this issue on Nov 11, 2026

   fix(metad): infer responses from accuracy in count_trials (#106)

   ...

   7270595

   fix(metad): check responses against accuracy in count_trials (#106)

   ...

   1f6da15

   fix(metad): warn on stimuli not coded 0/1, drop non-integer confidenc…

   ...

   3bfd3bb
3. lenarddome

   linked a pull request that will close this issuefix(metad): infer responses from accuracy in count_trials #108on Nov 11, 2026
4. lenarddome

   closed this as completedin #108on Nov 11, 2026

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

No labels

No labels

Type

Bug

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions

• Open in GitHub Copilot app