add wait flag to context put operations in test

[shihab-dls]

PR #385 passed CI, but this seems to have been a flaky pass, and is now failing main; this PR adds wait=True to test_softioc_system, which was left out of the merged PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Strengthened soft IOC system test robustness by implementing synchronous write operations with explicit wait directives to ensure proper test sequencing
  • Extended validation coverage to verify that readback field aliasing behaves correctly and consistently across all related system components

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3a881d12-925a-4e30-9e34-7e06df6924c6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 508d8af and 3effde9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/transports/epics/ca/test_softioc_system.py

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

test_ioc adds wait=True to both ctxt.put calls for :B and :AliasB, making writes synchronous. After updating :AliasB to 20, the test now also asserts that :B_RBV equals :AliasB_RBV and that both equal 20.

Changes

Alias RBV Assertion and Synchronous Writes

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Synchronous writes and aliased RBV assertions tests/transports/epics/ca/test_softioc_system.py	Both ctxt.put calls for :B and :AliasB now pass wait=True, and an additional assertion verifies that :B_RBV and :AliasB_RBV are aliased and reflect the written value of 20.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hops through channels with care,
Waiting for writes to settle in the air.
:B_RBV and :AliasB_RBV stand tall,
Both equal twenty — aliased, one and all! 🐇
The readback is right, the test will not stall!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title directly and clearly describes the main change: adding wait flags to context put operations in a test file.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix_tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.25%. Comparing base (ebb7a8e) to head (3effde9).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #386   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.25%   91.25%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        2892     2892           
=======================================
  Hits         2639     2639           
  Misses        253      253           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.