Skip to content

SW-107 — Audit CODEOWNERS coverage against frozen protected surfaces #122

Closed

Description

@dDevAhmed

Summary

Audit .github/CODEOWNERS against docs/contributing/wave-architecture.md and add missing protected-surface ownership entries without over-owning contributor-friendly paths.

Workstream

  • Workstream: WS-SEC
  • Protected surface: CODEOWNERS itself; maintainer review required

Scope

Compare the frozen protected/core list with current ownership. Add precise entries for security-sensitive generator/config/process/deployment/dev/release architecture surfaces that currently lack ownership.

Acceptance Criteria

  • every frozen protected path has an intentional ownership decision;
  • contributor-friendly template-local/docs/tests are not broadly locked down;
  • CODEOWNERS syntax remains valid;
  • ownership documentation stays aligned;
  • repository checks pass.

Dependencies

Contributor architecture freeze (#94) merged.


🏷 Labels

  • Stellar Wave
  • type: security
  • area: security
  • priority: P0
  • difficulty: medium
  • points: 150
  • workstream: security
  • protected-surface

Activity

  1. dmoonventure070-art commented on Oct 16, 2026

    @dmoonventure070-art

    @dmoonventure070-art has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    I’d love to help out with this issue. I’ve checked the current codebase/documentation and know exactly what needs to be updated to make this clearer. I will ensure everything aligns perfectly with your existing contribution guidelines.

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @dmoonventure070-art to this issue.

  2. Grace-ope commented on Oct 17, 2026

    @Grace-ope
    Contributor

    @Grace-ope has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    Hi team,
    I'm applying to work on this issue.
    I work across multiple stacks (TypeScript/Node, Rust, Python, and related tooling) and focus on clean, testable changes that match the acceptance criteria. I will keep the PR scoped to this issue only and ready for review.
    Ready to start immediately.

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @Grace-ope to this issue.

  3. jbeloved700 commented on Oct 17, 2026

    @jbeloved700
    Contributor

    @jbeloved700 has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    Hi Maintainer please I will like to work on this issue

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @jbeloved700 to this issue.

  4. drips-wave commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @drips-wave

    Congratulations, @jbeloved700! 🎉 Your application was accepted by the repo's maintainers, and the issue is due on October 22, 2026.

    🧑‍💻 @jbeloved700: Please resolve the issue such that the repo's maintainers have enough time to review your contribution before the due date. You'll earn Points for completing the issue on-time, which will make you eligible for a share of the Stellar Wave Program's reward pool.

    Warning

    When opening a PR, please link it to this issue to ensure it gets tracked accurately. Points are awarded when this issue is marked as completed by the maintainer.

    🤠 Repo maintainers: Please keep an eye on the contributor's progress and review their work before the due date. You can manage this issue, including adjusting its complexity and points, here.

    🌊 Happy Wave 🌊

  5. added
    help wantedExtra attention is needed
    intake: readyOpen for contributor claims
    and removed
    intake: queuedWave backlog not yet open for claims
    on Oct 18, 2026
  6. drips-wave commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @drips-wave

    This issue has been completed by @jbeloved700 as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th Wave 🥳

    😎 @jbeloved700: You earned 100 Points for completing this issue! Once the Wave's rewards are finalized, you'll be eligible for a percentage of the Wave's reward pool based on the percentage of total points you've earned. Learn more here. You can also Leave a review to share your experience working on this issue.

    🧑‍💻 Repo maintainers: How'd the contributor do? Leave a review to share your experience working with them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions