Skip to content

PREWAVE-BE-068 — Harden Search Query Complexity and Result Stability #664

Closed

Description

@dDevAhmed

Problem context

Source audit identified this distinct API production-readiness boundary.

Technical scope

Bound operators, fields, terms, sort keys, result window, timeout, and canonical tie-break order.

Required tests

Empty/huge query, wildcard abuse, injection, Unicode, timeout, concurrent inserts, and pagination tests.

Acceptance criteria

  • Query work is bounded.
  • Results have stable ordering.
  • Unapproved/private fields are unsearchable.
  • Rate limits are cost-aware.

Constraints

Canonical finalized contract events remain authoritative. Bind chain data to chain/release/artifact provenance; fail closed on stale, ambiguous, unauthorized, or incomplete state. Do not weaken CI or expose secrets/protected data.

Dependencies

Non-goals

Unrelated work, mainnet deployment, or applying Stellar Wave before maintainer activation.

Complexity and points

  • High — 200 points

Candidate only; activation remains maintainer-controlled.

Activity

  1. mubking commented on Oct 15, 2026

    @mubking

    Hi, I'm Mubarak — a Full-Stack & Blockchain Developer with 3+ years of experience. I've reviewed this issue and I'm confident I can handle it. I'll submit a clean PR within 2–3 days. Please assign it to me!

  2. richiesplug commented on Oct 16, 2026

    @richiesplug
    Contributor

    @richiesplug has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    I’m interested in taking this issue. I’ll review the existing implementation, identify the cause of the problem, and work on a clean solution while making sure I don’t introduce new issues.

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @richiesplug to this issue.

  3. cleank0de commented on Oct 16, 2026

    @cleank0de
    Contributor

    @cleank0de has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    Hi maintainer
    I’d love to help out with this issue. I’ve checked the current codebase/documentation and know exactly what needs to be updated to make this clearer. I will ensure everything aligns perfectly with your existing contribution guidelines.

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @cleank0de to this issue.

  4. Devadakene commented on Oct 16, 2026

    @Devadakene

    @Devadakene has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    I would like to work on this issue having worked on something similar issues in the past. Please assign

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @Devadakene to this issue.

  5. drips-wave commented on Oct 16, 2026

    @drips-wave

    Congratulations, @cleank0de! 🎉 Your application was accepted by the repo's maintainers, and the issue is due on October 22, 2026.

    🧑‍💻 @cleank0de: Please resolve the issue such that the repo's maintainers have enough time to review your contribution before the due date. You'll earn Points for completing the issue on-time, which will make you eligible for a share of the Stellar Wave Program's reward pool.

    Warning

    When opening a PR, please link it to this issue to ensure it gets tracked accurately. Points are awarded when this issue is marked as completed by the maintainer.

    🤠 Repo maintainers: Please keep an eye on the contributor's progress and review their work before the due date. You can manage this issue, including adjusting its complexity and points, here.

    🌊 Happy Wave 🌊

  6. drips-wave commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @drips-wave

    This issue has been completed by @cleank0de as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th Wave 🥳

    😎 @cleank0de: You earned 200 Points for completing this issue! Once the Wave's rewards are finalized, you'll be eligible for a percentage of the Wave's reward pool based on the percentage of total points you've earned. Learn more here. You can also Leave a review to share your experience working on this issue.

    🧑‍💻 Repo maintainers: How'd the contributor do? Leave a review to share your experience working with them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions