Repository navigation
Add knowledge widening and deepening with checked JiuwenSwarm output - #286
Conversation
tzhouam
changed the title
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ea228aa035
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| if i + 1 < len(trace) and not re.search( | ||
| r"\b" + re.escape(trace[i + 1]["symbol"].rsplit(".", 1)[-1]) + r"\s*\(", span): | ||
| raise ValueError("flow span does not show the next call") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For non-Python traces, this only checks that the caller span contains a call with the target's basename; it never verifies that the import or module binding points to target["path"]. For example, a TypeScript caller importing helper from actual.ts is accepted when the next trace step instead names an unrelated wrong.ts::helper, provided both files declare that name. This silently certifies incorrect source chains and inflates semantic-depth coverage, so cross-file calls need module/import resolution before being accepted.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Feature summaries and interface records show breadth but leave implementation behavior unexplained. Add
kb widenand a separatekb deepenpass for source-backed flow, API contracts, configuration, dependencies, failures, tradeoffs, and validation. Existing rule-focused init deepening and calibration keep their stage contracts.Deepening binds each accepted facet to exact source spans, an immutable pin, and an independent advisory verdict. Checkpoints retain accepted work and cumulative accounting across interruptions; retries prioritize features without accepted depth. Existing quick maps remain intact when depth links are added.
The JiuwenSwarm run at
f0a69728c96b5961d993449f1a901cbd2f4dac5badds 77 depth pages containing 173 checked facets. It used existing knowledge, project docs, and 24 partial maintainer documents, with Zcode GLM-5.3 generation and Codex review. The independent audit and native approval bindings have no errors.eval/knowledge-depth/.