Repository navigation
Keep feature discovery reports compact and retain full audit artifacts - #303
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A full JiuwenSwarm discovery scan produces a projected 12–13 MB report before its final boundary decisions, with repeated receipt metadata and thousands of candidate descriptions. Feature discovery now publishes a compact summary and retains the complete report as an immutable, content-addressed artifact outside Git. The checkpoint and summary bind its exact path, byte size and SHA-256; cached and prepared publication reject missing, altered or escaped artifacts.
Completed unpublished legacy previews re-render through the native stage using their saved scans, independent reviews and boundary audit without calling either model again. Published historical catalogs remain immutable. Source scope, prompts, model configuration, feature definitions, budgets and correction limits are unchanged.
Validation: 176 focused tests pass in both implementation and independent runs; native receipt/input assertions now inspect the real complete artifact. Regressions cover large-report size, canonical bytes across recovery, unchanged catalogs, containment, missing/tampered archives and exact restoration, prepared publication, native boundary failures, and legacy preview migration. Independent code review found no remaining actionable issue. Full CI is required before merge.