Skip to content

kb init(jiuwenswarm): modules - #313

Closed
tzhouam wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/init-jiuwenswarm-modules-newinit-20261006-v3
Closed

tzhouam wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
kb/init-jiuwenswarm-modules-newinit-20261006-v3

Conversation

@tzhouam

@tzhouam tzhouam commented Oct 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

kb init stage modules for jiuwenswarm (openJiuwen-ai/jiuwenswarm).

  • Upstream pin: f0a69728c96b5961d993449f1a901cbd2f4dac5b
  • Knowledge base: a7923c363195d51bdb8b73a73698204bd3ce7473
  • Model spend (accounted): $0.00

Human-merged. Rules were screened by the docs redundancy filter, checked at the pin, and given an advisory verdict; fail rules are already removed.

Coverage:

metric before after
modules routed 87.5% 100.0%

Needs human edit:

  • source index docs/assets/images/config-model-test.png: read failed; retained as unknown
  • source index docs/assets/images/config-vision-model-test.png: read failed; retained as unknown
  • source index docs/assets/images/config_model_connect_test.png: read failed; retained as unknown
  • source index jiuwenswarm/channels/web/frontend/tests/fixtures/trajectory-archive-subjects.trajectory.zip: read failed; retained as unknown
  • source index tests/unit_tests/agentserver/test_build_config_entry_transport.py: parse failed; retained as unknown
  • source index tests/unit_tests/gateway/test_channel_manager_file_fanout.py: parse failed; retained as unknown

Notes:

  • unlimited subscription generation and independent judgment explicitly selected; no stage USD ceiling applies; fixed USD accounting is observability only, and unreported invoiced costs remain unknown
  • module jiuwenswarm/channels/browser/: absorbed into owner browser-client (jiuwenswarm/channels/browser/)
  • module jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/: absorbed into owner ide-clients (jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/jetbrains-plugin/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/shared-webview/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/esbuild.js, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/client/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/codeActions/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/context/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/editor/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/swarm/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/ui/StatusBar.ts)
  • module jiuwenswarm/channels/tui/: absorbed into owner tui-client (jiuwenswarm/channels/tui/)
  • module jiuwenswarm/extensions/: absorbed into owner extensions-plugins (jiuwenswarm/extensions/init.py)
  • module jiuwenswarm/runtime/: absorbed into owner agent-runtime (jiuwenswarm/runtime/init.py)
  • module scripts/: 28 prefixes would be needed to absorb it into owner protocols; it gets its own map card

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-05T20:52:28.365523Z 681e3eb PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 681e3eb1e1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +548 to +549
- jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/terminal/TerminalManager.ts
- jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/ui/ChatPanel.ts

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Route these files back to the existing IDE owner

When a PR changes either of these files, Direct now routes it exclusively to the nearly empty ide-vscode/_index.md, even though both files were already indexed under ide-clients/vscode-extension-src/source-contracts-01.md and ChatPanel.ts is covered by ide-clients/feature-depth-vscode.md. Add these prefixes to ide-clients and remove the duplicate owner/page so reviewers receive the existing VS Code knowledge instead of a synonymous split owner.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L7-L11

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +21 to +22
- `jiuwenswarm/scripts/watch-folders.js` — 开发辅助:先执行一次生成脚本,再用 chokidar 监听 agent 目录($JIUWENSWARM_DATA_DIR/agent 或 ~/.jiuwenswarm/agent,回退到 ../resources/agent),变化时重新生
- `jiuwenswarm/scripts/generate-agent-folders.js` — 按文件夹分组文件清单,_zh/_en 后缀去重、排序保证输出稳定,失败时写空 JSON

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Complete the truncated script descriptions

When readers consult this architecture page for folder-watch or reconnect behavior, both descriptions terminate mid-word (重新生 and 4 秒重), leaving the documented actions ambiguous. Complete the generated sentences so the page records the actual regeneration and reconnect behavior.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@tzhouam tzhouam closed this Oct 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant