[tzhouam]

kb init stage modules for jiuwenswarm (openJiuwen-ai/jiuwenswarm).

• Upstream pin: f0a69728c96b5961d993449f1a901cbd2f4dac5b
• Knowledge base: a7923c363195d51bdb8b73a73698204bd3ce7473
• Model spend (accounted): $1.50

Human-merged. Rules were screened by the docs redundancy filter, checked at the pin, and given an advisory verdict; fail rules are already removed.

rule	page	verdict
module:jiuwenswarm/scripts/	repos/jiuwenswarm/components/gateway-channels/module-review.md	unsure

Dropped rules

• module:jiuwenswarm/scripts/: source review: {"faithful": "Most implementation claims are supported by generate-agent-folders.js:5\u201318,33\u201355,67\u2013105; watch-folders.js:5\u201346; and whatsapp-bridge.js:32\u201336,99\u2013170,175\u2013274. However, these files do not establish that all scripts are exclusively manual/external tools or outside core runtime entry points. The listed documentation has no supplied contents to establish its claimed relevance. Several sentences are truncated, leaving their intended claims unsettled.", "does_not_weaken": "The supplied before text is empty, so this addition removes or softens no existing gate, requirement, or warning in the shown evidence.", "non_contradictory": "surrounding_rules is empty, and before is empty; no conflicting rule is shown."}
• module:scripts/: source review: {"faithful": "The introduction excludes runtime code except harmony_entry.py, but scripts/jiuwenswarm_exe_entry.py:649\u2013653 executes desktop_main(), and scripts/openjiuwen_team_mcp_exe_entry.py:70\u201378 activates runtime paths and executes server_main(). Several additional claims lack shown implementation evidence, including build-exe.bat, build-harmony-hap.sh, build.ps1, and TESTING.md paths being outdated; source_scope explicitly leaves unshown behavior unknown.", "does_not_weaken": "change.before is empty and surrounding_rules is empty, so this addition removes or softens no shown existing gate, requirement, or warning.", "non_contradictory": "surrounding_rules is empty. The shared-runtime descriptions are consistent with scripts/build-runtimes.sh:3\u20136 and scripts/build-runtimes.psm1:2\u20136; no conflict with another shown rule is established."}
• module:scripts/nfs/: source review: {"faithful": "The prose claims all scripts default to JIUWEN_TEAM_WORKSPACE_ROOT, but teardown_nfs_server.sh:5\u20138 defaults only an exports file and operation flags. It also states server setup creates and persists a bind mount without qualifying that setup_nfs_server.sh:155\u2013158 does so only when export_dir differs from mount_point; their defaults are identical at lines 7\u20139. Root checks require EUID=0, not specifically manual execution through sudo (setup_nfs_server.sh:56\u201359; setup_nfs_client.sh:48\u201351).", "does_not_weaken": "The supplied before text is empty, so this addition removes or softens no existing gate, requirement, or warning.", "non_contradictory": "The supplied surrounding_rules list is empty; no conflicting rule is shown."}

Coverage:

metric	before	after
modules routed	87.5%	95.3%

Modules no route reaches:

• jiuwenswarm/scripts/
• scripts/
• scripts/nfs/

Needs human edit:

• source index docs/assets/images/config-model-test.png: read failed; retained as unknown
• source index docs/assets/images/config-vision-model-test.png: read failed; retained as unknown
• source index docs/assets/images/config_model_connect_test.png: read failed; retained as unknown
• source index jiuwenswarm/channels/web/frontend/tests/fixtures/trajectory-archive-subjects.trajectory.zip: read failed; retained as unknown
• source index tests/unit_tests/agentserver/test_build_config_entry_transport.py: parse failed; retained as unknown
• source index tests/unit_tests/gateway/test_channel_manager_file_fanout.py: parse failed; retained as unknown

Not done (budget or caps):

• module jiuwenswarm/scripts/: source review unsure; card remains unknown
• module scripts/: source review fail; card remains unknown
• module scripts/nfs/: source review fail; card remains unknown

Notes:

• unlimited subscription generation and independent judgment explicitly selected; no stage USD ceiling applies; fixed USD accounting is observability only, and unreported invoiced costs remain unknown
• module jiuwenswarm/channels/browser/: absorbed into owner browser-client (jiuwenswarm/channels/browser/)
• module jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/: absorbed into owner ide-clients (jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/jetbrains-plugin/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/shared-webview/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/esbuild.js, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/client/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/codeActions/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/context/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/editor/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/swarm/, jiuwenswarm/channels/ide/packages/vscode-extension/src/ui/StatusBar.ts)
• module jiuwenswarm/channels/tui/: absorbed into owner tui-client (jiuwenswarm/channels/tui/)
• module jiuwenswarm/extensions/: absorbed into owner extensions-plugins (jiuwenswarm/extensions/init.py)
• module jiuwenswarm/runtime/: absorbed into owner agent-runtime (jiuwenswarm/runtime/init.py)
• module scripts/: 28 prefixes would be needed to absorb it into owner protocols; it gets its own map card

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-05T21:10:13.637507Z	d15625e	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d15625e9f9

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Route these files through the existing IDE owner

For reviews changing ChatPanel.ts or TerminalManager.ts, this new route exclusively selects ide-vscode and reports its quick map as complete, even though the routed page contains only a feature label and source paths. The existing implementation knowledge for both files remains under components/ide-clients/feature-depth-vscode.md and components/ide-clients/vscode-extension-src/source-contracts-01.md, while the same terminal feature's JetBrains implementation also routes to ide-clients; consequently Direct stops at the empty new owner and omits the relevant IDE knowledge. Absorb these prefixes into ide-clients rather than splitting one cross-IDE feature into a placeholder owner.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L12-L17

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.