Repository navigation
docs(kb): report JiuwenSwarm new-init delivery and unresolved gaps - #322
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The newest JiuwenSwarm init discovered and merged 94 additional features and published approved foundation knowledge while retaining explicit unknowns. This report separates the merged KB from the unpublished depth checkpoint: all original 552 approvals are preserved, and 495 new receipt-bound depth facets passed source and native integrity audits, but the final semantic targets remain unmet.
Publish the Chinese comparison and compact status only. Keep init incomplete, retain all 164 unknown facets and the zero-depth logger blocker, and link full native traces outside Git. Include file counts and text sizes, structural versus semantic evidence coverage, concrete review-context examples, and the exact frozen source/version observation.
Validation: independent whole-block/native binding audit and final official preview audits are recorded in the report. Full CI must pass on this report PR head before merge. No new GLM PR-review accuracy or speed benchmark is claimed.