Skip to content

docs: a calendar view adds a page; a document's line-items calendar is the items pane - #8

Open
delchev wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/calendar-additional-page
Open

docs: a calendar view adds a page; a document's line-items calendar is the items pane#8
delchev wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/calendar-additional-page

Conversation

@delchev

@delchev delchev commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Renders the specification clarification in the Presentation chapter.

The chapter said view: "renders an entity as a time-based page instead of a table" — which reads as, and was implemented as, replacing the entity's page family, costing a document master its document editor. This states the additive rule: /<Entity> is the calendar, /<Entity>/list the entity's own browse page, create/edit stay the entity's own, so a document may be browsed on a calendar and still edited as a document. view: slots is called out as the exception. It also documents the previously undocumented line-items case: a document's items child declaring view: calendar makes the items pane the calendar, and cannot also be a chat thread.

The view row of docs/reference.md is reworded to match.

Follows IntentFile/intent-specification#5 (the normative source) — merge that first. Reference implementation: eclipse-dirigible/dirigible#6624.

delchev and others added 2 commits August 9, 2026 10:16
…s the items pane

Renders the specification clarification (IntentFile/intent-specification#5) in
the Presentation chapter: the additive routing table for view: calendar / range,
the slots exception, and the document line-items calendar. The DSL reference row
for `view` follows.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Follows the specification revision: `view: slots` is no longer carved out as the
exception - a picker creates a record, the list/document page works with it
afterwards, and an author needs both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant