Skip to content

Interpretation in DeepConf #7

Description

@PREPONDERANCE

https://github.com/JamesSand/UsefulCommands/blob/master/08-Research-utils/qiang-ideas/deepconf.md

I came across this from DeepConf issue section. Specifically, you've mentioned that we actually wanted the q to be sharper. This means the first item in the decomposed equation would have lower values (rather than higher values). So the problem lingers: does the author actually confuses certainty and uncertainty or the interpretation leads somewhere else.

Thanks in advance. This is a great repo!

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions