Skip to content

Indexing validation #1259

Description

@baltzell

I was looking for optimizations, in this case some smaller methods for potential inlining in #1258 in RungeKuttaDoca.computeCovMat, and was curious about the indexing here, particularly theC.get(2,0/1):

cNext[3][0] = C.get(2,0)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,0)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,0)*sF.dtydq0
+ sF.dxdq0 *(C.get(2,4)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,4)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,4)*sF.dtydq0)
+ sF.dxdtx0*(C.get(2,2)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,2)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,2)*sF.dtydq0)
+ sF.dxdty0*(C.get(2,3)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,3)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,3)*sF.dtydq0);
cNext[3][1] = C.get(2,1)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,1)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,1)*sF.dtydq0
+ sF.dydq0 *(C.get(2,4)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,4)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,4)*sF.dtydq0)
+ sF.dydtx0*(C.get(2,2)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,2)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,2)*sF.dtydq0)
+ sF.dydty0*(C.get(2,3)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,3)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,3)*sF.dtydq0);
cNext[3][2] = sF.dtxdq0 *(C.get(2,4)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,4)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,4)*sF.dtydq0)
+ sF.dtxdtx0*(C.get(2,2)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,2)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,2)*sF.dtydq0)
+ sF.dtxdty0*(C.get(2,3)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,3)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,3)*sF.dtydq0);
cNext[3][3] = sF.dtydq0 *(C.get(2,4)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,4)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,4)*sF.dtydq0)
+ sF.dtydtx0*(C.get(2,2)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,2)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,2)*sF.dtydq0)
+ sF.dtydty0*(C.get(2,3)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,3)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,3)*sF.dtydq0);

Is this snippet really correct relative to the previous 3 indices? Those do C.get(i,0/1).

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Fields

Priority

None yet

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions