Use GraphsInterfaceChecker.jl in the test suite

[Max0nyshchenko]

Solves #3

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.83333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 67.46%. Comparing base (8be0b30) to head (e24d250).
⚠️ Report is 14 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/VNGraphs.jl	95.83%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #14       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   45.90%   67.46%   +21.56%     
===========================================
  Files           1        1               
  Lines          61       83       +22     
===========================================
+ Hits           28       56       +28     
+ Misses         33       27        -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Krastanov]

Thank you, this is a very helpful contribution! I have a small suggestion for improving the tests. Could you look into it?

[Krastanov]

Could you add a few random graphs too? If I am reading this correctly, currently it is being tested only on empty graphs. Something like VNGraph(Graphs.whatever_random_graph_generator(...))

[Max0nyshchenko]

Sure, makes sense, thank you. I will do that and keep you updated, might take some time for me as I'm not that familiar with these libs (Graphs, VNGraph and VN in C).

[Max0nyshchenko]

Done, please feel free to check.

[Max0nyshchenko]

@Krastanov, please feel free to check

[Max0nyshchenko]

@Krastanov — following up on this one. I added the random-graph cases you suggested back in December, so test_consistency.jl now covers generated graphs rather than only empty ones. I think it's ready for another look whenever you have time.

The check results shown here are from the original December run and are stale — happy to rebase onto current master for a fresh run if that would be useful.

No rush, and thanks again for the review.