Skip to content

Keep wiki details consistent with the published records - #160

Merged
moshehbenavraham merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/wiki-detail-publication-parity
Nov 5, 2026
Merged

moshehbenavraham merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/wiki-detail-publication-parity

Conversation

@moshehbenavraham

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A complete reference-cache comparison found later duplicate mob records overwriting the first record selected during publication, causing lists and detail pages to show different creatures for the same zone/VNUM. Keep the first cached record, matching the publisher. Omit zero/no-op object applies from details, matching the published filter rows.

Add regressions for duplicate source ordering and meaningful object modifiers. Backend configuration, format, lint, types, MUD-write verification, 27 focused tests and build pass. This repair changes detail caching only; the verified current reference generation does not need replacement.

@moshehbenavraham
moshehbenavraham merged commit a21e175 into master Nov 5, 2026
6 checks passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-05T21:45:38.331082Z d972985 PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-05T21:46:44.447883Z d972985 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant