Repository navigation
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Ryan Turner <ryan@turnrye.com>
turnrye
force-pushed
the
feat/aprs-packet
branch
from
October 14, 2026 00:08
18199ff to
c633df4
Compare
Contributor
|
Is it legal to put route information (e.g. WIDE2-2) into the packet address and have a station listening to M17 also relay to APRS-RF? |
Contributor
|
@mobilinkd , Are you talking about the possible route of an M17 APRS packet when that packet is sent to an M17 reflector? |
|
WRT to the comments above, I think defining what gateway means in this context would help. I can imagine several answers:
These all seem at least superficially reasonable to me, although I haven't though about them much. But they probably raise different interesting issues. |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Specify the APRS (0x02) packet payload
The spec reserves packet identifier
0x02for APRS but doesn't say what goes in it, so there's no way for one radio or gateway to know another will understand it. I'm proposing the simplest thing that works with APRS-IS today: a TNC-2 text line, null-terminated like SMS, withM17*in the path.Change
0x02, one UTF-8 TNC-2 line of up to 821 bytes, a null byte, then the CRC, same as SMS.M17*in the path of their own packets.Source callsigns work as they already do: the LSF source is the transmitting station (Address Fields), and APRS sources follow APRS101 Chapter 17.
Why
0x01): APRS-IS carries names that don't fit in an AX.25 address, likeWINLINKand D-STAR's-S/-Bsuffixes. In my light-weight investigation, I found these were ~1/3 of packets near me.M17*from the station: so M17 traffic can be counted on APRS-IS like D-STAR's, where radios addDSTAR*themselves (DPRS). Gateways can't add it: "IGates must not modify paths of packets gated to APRS-IS except to append ,qAR,IGATECALL" (IGate rules).I cited APRS101, the last formally adopted APRS spec. I can move this to
dev, next to SMS and TLE, if you prefer.Open questions