Repository navigation
Owner scope: a wallet owner's explicit opt-in - #124
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…eplacing the connection
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ADR 2: the consent change wallet owner actions need, before the strategy grant.
POST …/consent/texttakes{ owner: true }only at a wallet owner's choice: at connect, or to add it to a connection without it (anything else live is stillalready_connected).checkConsentaccepts read+treasury or read+treasury+owner exactly. A DAO's consent never carries owner (the platform files a DAO's owner actions for its vote): asking for it isbad_request, nothing filed.already_connectedafter, DAO refusal, consent checks); stack (browser): the upgrade stored as owner, read and treasury, and an open proposal under the old consent reads withdrawn.