Skip to content

Proposal: AUR package (openpets-bin) for Arch/CachyOS #232

Description

@pinoybear

Hi alvinunreal,

I've loved openpets since I first came across it a few months ago. It's become a must-have on all my Linux machines! I filed #119/PR #120 a while back (merged into v3.4.0), and more recently opened #221-223 with fixes in #224-226 for a few bugs I ran into testing v4.0.0. I've been running OpenPets from source pretty heavily on a couple of CachyOS machines, and was thinking about putting together an AUR package so Arch/CachyOS users could install your app with a simple paru -S openpets-bin instead of manually grabbing the AppImage. Another benefit of an AUR package is the app would be updated when a user updates their system with paru -Syu.

I'm wondering if you are okay with an AUR package existing at all. Some projects would rather stick to AppImage/Flatpak-only distribution, or want to publish under an official name themselves...

If you're ok with me maintaining an AUR package:

  • Any preference on naming? openpets-bin is the usual AUR convention for a package that just wraps a binary/AppImage release, but wanted to check you don't already have one planned or a name you'd prefer.
  • How would you want version bumps handled — should I just watch your repo for new GitHub releases and update the package myself, or would some other signal work better?
  • Would you link it from the README/docs once it's up? That lends the package a lot of credibility if you approve.

Let me know what you think. -Pinoybear

No activity

Activity on this issue will appear here.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions