[EmergentMonk]

Summary

Refresh the public SONIFICATION landing page without touching research source, frozen evidence, tags or release assets.

• Add a centered, self-contained 1440×450 SVG research banner (docs/assets/sonification-banner.svg) with geometric/spectral artwork and no remote assets, external fonts or scripts.
• Add eight linked version-specific Zenodo DOI badges (ETQ, D4-TIA, MAT-SPEC, SPARK-001, SONIFICATION-FORMAL-001).
• Add six live GitHub Actions badges for project tests, native Ada/Python differential workflows, and read-only historical proof-receipt integrity checks. The owner-only GNATprove workflow is deliberately not depicted as automatic CI proof.
• Add a research-track overview, scoped verification table, reproducibility commands, scientific limits, current formalization DOI/source identity, and published DOI catalogue.
• Preserve the detailed MAT-SPEC-001–010, ETQ-303, D4-TIA, runtime-artifact and scientific-boundary documentation below.
• Repair escaped inline Markdown backticks in existing README examples.

Exact release and research boundaries

• Formal research milestone: sonification-formal-001-research.1
• Published DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.24097287
• Frozen source: ef2851fd44894dd95a4c3184ff9e41aeb4d64d72.
• Retained SPARK owner receipts: 26/26, 23/23, and 9/9 over three separate, bounded and source-pinned proof runs.
• MAT-010 Phase A accepted; Phases B/C, production Python refinement and independent physical admission remain OPEN.
• No new physical theory or classifier accuracy is asserted. No MAT-SPEC-011.

Review / validation

• README text integrity checked: existing numbered MAT-SPEC profiles, root policies and scientific-boundary sections remain present.
• Confirmed eight DOI badges and six CI badge links against the actual repository workflow filenames.
• README uses explicit centered HTML and accessible image alt text.
• GitHub compare checked: README.md + one new SVG only.
• No application tests or Lean/GNATprove execution claimed; documentation-only PR.

Owner review and approval requested. Do not merge automatically.

Summary by Sourcery

Refresh the SONIFICATION README as a traceable research landing page without changing research source, evidence, release assets, or formalization claims.

New Features:

• Add a research-focused SONIFICATION landing page with a self-contained visual banner, versioned DOI gallery, live workflow badges, research-track overview, and reproducibility guidance.

Bug Fixes:

• Correct escaped inline Markdown code formatting in existing README examples.

Enhancements:

• Document verification scope, source-pinned formalization identity, assurance boundaries, scientific limitations, roadmap status, and published research records while preserving existing detailed documentation.

Documentation:

• Expand README navigation and public-facing documentation with formal verification results, reproduction commands, scientific nonclaims, and a consolidated DOI catalogue.

[sourcery-ai]

Sorry @EmergentMonk, you've used your own review budget of 250,000 diff characters for the last 7 days.

You can request another review in 1 day and 4 hours by commenting @sourcery-ai review. Upgrade to get a review now.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

UI

Add the self-contained geometric research banner used at the top of the landing page.

• docs/assets/sonification-banner.svg L1-83

Documentation

Refresh the README landing page with release and CI badges, research and verification scope, reproduction guidance, scientific boundaries, and a DOI catalogue while preserving the detailed material-profile documentation.

• README.md L1-94, L163-167, L552-572 (+4 small edits)

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-10T05:08:37.193909Z	7632ba0	Manual request
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-10T05:08:12.669502Z	7632ba0	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[EmergentMonk]

@codex Please Review this exact SHA 7632ba0 gainst the existing contract. Report only actionable correctness defects, with a minimal reproduction, expected versus actual behavior, and affected lines. State whether each reproduction was executed or statically inferred. Don’t repeat fixed findings without a new failing case. Keep architectural suggestions separate and non-blocking.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

Reviewed commit: 7632ba0ccd

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".