Conversation
Documentation build overview
26 files changed ·
|
Documentation build overview
26 files changed ·
|
| .. note:: | ||
|
|
||
| 公开的 Target50 协议固定在 ``robots/robocasa/eval/target50.json`` 中。 | ||
| 公开的 Target50 协议固定在 ``robots/robocasa/eval/target50_v2.json`` 中。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is the target50.json unused?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is still used for explicit validation of historical v1 records with --manifest robots/robocasa/eval/target50.json. Current runs and the default validator use v2. The paired guides now explain this distinction, and regression coverage verifies that v1 records require the legacy manifest. Updated in 4753e89.
| memory/robocasa/results/<Task>_s0.json | ||
| memory/robocasa/results/recipe_<Task>_s0.jsonl | ||
| memory/robocasa/results/<Task>.md # 可选 | ||
| 新版严格采用 PR #130 交付包的 103 份记忆:43 份 seed-0 audit JSON、43 份 |
| --memory-profile local \ | ||
| --memory-dir ./target50-memory/robocasa | ||
| python -m robots.robocasa.migrate_memory \ | ||
| --source /path/to/package/changed_tree/robocasa-memory-hf-staging-20260829/robocasa/memory \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there any way to use a custom hf url and path directly? And where is this folder changed_tree/robocasa-memory-hf-staging-20260829/ from?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is the migrate_memory for migrate the explorations?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The guides now document RPENT_MEMORY_HF_REPO=<owner>/<dataset> for another dataset with the same RoboCasa subtree. For a custom path or branch, use hf download and point --memory-profile local --memory-dir at the downloaded subtree. The environment variable accepts a repository ID, not a browser URL.
The old changed_tree/... path came from a local delivery package. The migration script only repackaged those supplied files; it was not required for exploration. I removed the script and package-specific instructions, addressing the follow-up question as well. Updated in 4753e89.
| 上的规范复现清单。它固定 ``target`` 环境 split、依赖 revision、memory 边界、 | ||
| task/seed 矩阵、cell 时限、成功来源与重试规则;协议 ID 为 | ||
| ``robocasa-harness-vla-v1``: | ||
| ``robocasa-harness-vla-v2``: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The protocol ID identifies the result format and evaluation rules so the validator can distinguish historical v1 records from current v2 records. It does not select or pin the memory data version. Both guides now state this directly (4753e89).
| ``<output_dir>/vla_server.log``。 | ||
|
|
||
| 已发布的 Target50 结果 | ||
| 历史 task-only v1 结果 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
a simple description for the old result is enough. for fully table of the old version, give a url to the specific commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Done. Both guides now retain only a short historical-results summary and link to the full table at a specific, verified code commit. They also distinguish those historical task-only aggregates from the current task-global policy. Updated in 4753e89.
| @@ -0,0 +1,2257 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
clean the files in this folder
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removed the one-off JSON/Markdown validation reports and migration utility in 4753e89. The evaluation folder retains runtime result handling, reusable validation code, and the current/historical protocol resources. New validation traces and data-version records remain local rather than being committed.
| @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ launcher. | |||
| ## Runtime Flow | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if the content is included in the .rst, this file can be removed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Done. The duplicate robot README is removed, matching current main. Setup and runtime instructions live in the English/Chinese RST guides; the root README entries and HF dataset READMEs now explain the task/global layout. Updated in 4753e89.
| remote_repo=robot_spec.memory_repo_id, | ||
| **( | ||
| { | ||
| "revision": getattr(args, "memory_revision", None) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is there a --memory-revision args in the main.py?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The original flag was registered by the RoboCasa robot extension, rather than directly in main.py. It is now removed along with revision forwarding: memory uses the standard unpinned HF sync in both CLI and Dashboard. Tests cover both entry points and memory policies. Updated in 4753e89.
| #: extensions can opt into exploration with their own reset semantics. | ||
| supports_exploration: bool = False | ||
| memory_repo_id: str = "RLinf/RPent-memory" | ||
| memory_revision: str | None = None |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the memory_revision is too redundant
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agreed; the added RobotSpec.memory_revision field and RoboCasa-specific revision plumbing are removed. The shared RobotSpec, CLI/Dashboard sync and memory manager match current main; mutable HF/local memory sources use the existing interfaces. Updated in 4753e89.
|
Do RoboCasa Target50 runs need a strict reproducibility branch or a pinned HF revision for this memory, or is following the mutable main branch intentional? if strict reproduction is required, could we record the resolved revision or content hash in the result metadata? |
|
@Sonorous281 Following mutable For a strict comparison, download once, keep those exact files unchanged, and run every cell against that directory with The paired guides now make that scope explicit: the v2 validator checks memory policy and read completeness, but does not establish content equality between runs (977378a). Replying to #190 (comment) . |
| ``robocasa-harness-vla-v1``. Source dependencies follow the recorded ``rpent`` | ||
| branches and must be recorded at their resolved revisions for each run: | ||
| The current ``robots/robocasa/eval/target50_v2.json`` protocol | ||
| (``robocasa-harness-vla-v2``) uses task/global memory without pinning its |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I’m really confused, how these protocols relate to the leaderboard. Were the robocasa leaderboard results produced using target50_v2.json?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, why was astra result evaluated on 250 cells while gpt5.5 and opus used 340 cell?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarified in 2cffcdc: the leaderboard reports scores independently; the two manifests define evaluation and validation rules. V1 is kept for historical records, while v2 describes current task-specific + global runs with a GPT-5.5 reference profile—we cannot claim that all existing leaderboard entries came from v2. Both guides now use the leaderboard's GPT-5.5 values (57.1% overall; 92.0% / 61.0% / 13.8% by split), and the older per-task counts are marked as historical.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The 250-cell figure was outdated. The contributor confirmed 340 cells in #205; I synced main and updated both guides in 2cffcdc to 180/80/80, keeping the leaderboard's reported Astra rates (59.20% overall; 87.78% / 43.75% / 42.50%). No success counts were reconstructed from rounded percentages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rechecked the current head with #202 on latest main: v1 remains for historical records; v2 describes task-specific + global runs, not the provenance of every leaderboard entry. Both guides report Astra as 340 cells (180/80/80), preserving leaderboard rates without inferring success counts. The existing changes remain in place. Combined validation: 673 passed, 3 skipped; pre-commit and strict EN/ZH builds passed.
|
Updated for #164 in 89c8566. Exploration keeps inbox writes, attempt limits, reset and recipe export; evaluation keeps on-demand task/global access and no-reset. Local evaluation rejects missing global memory and competing task pairs. Combined with #201/#202: 693 tests passed, 3 optional-dependency skips; pre-commit and both docs builds pass. Five real model/MCP read checks passed. The native-layout case uses an explicitly synthetic export/merge fixture, with no robot episode. |
89c8566 to
f6acde3
Compare
|
Rebased onto main |
RoboCasa now provides the current task-specific references and global memory together, with on-demand reads. Reading every file is not a condition for actions or finish. Cross-task restrictions, no-reset and independent per-run read auditing remain.
Changes
task-specificandtask-familyconsistently in shared memory tools, robot prompts and both guides. Remove the optional memory policy, full-read gate, CORPUS dependency and RoboCasa revision plumbing.eecf2069, retaining the earlier merge commits' memory/exploration fixes, fix(memory): handle malformed YAML frontmatter #209's malformed-YAML handling and docs(readme): add Cosmos Policy to the WAM feature matrix #217's README update.Data and code dependencies
HF #13 depends on HF #12. It supplies the current directory names; RoboCasa's 103 memory bodies are unchanged. New memory updates go to main.
reproduce/memoryretains the existing GPT-5.5 / Harness-VLA corpus and historical layout; #14 stays closed.#202 owns LIBERO version selection and robot-specific memory preparation. #201 owns Codex turn budgets. #215 owns the leaderboard presentation and companion assets. Coordinate the matching data and code changes; historical layouts need their corresponding code.
Validation