Repository navigation
ios tests: audit the walk strictly once held and in motion to report; triage of the UI test failures #165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
AidenJohnston
wants to merge
5
commits into
t3/ios-mvf
Choose a base branch
from
t3/ci-flake-fixes
base: t3/ios-mvf
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+62
−14
Open
ios tests: audit the walk strictly once held and in motion to report; triage of the UI test failures #165
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ad942d8
ios tests: audit the walk once the autopilot holds it
AidenJohnston ee8cdcc
ios tests: say what the held walk shows
AidenJohnston 160c9e7
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/t3/ios-mvf' into t3/ci-flake-fixes
AidenJohnston 32f6e71
ios tests: audit the walk in motion too, to report
AidenJohnston 4925f37
ios: the autopilot's gate waits four minutes, past the test's work on…
AidenJohnston File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AUDITline or attachment for anyone to review. Record first-pass findings in this report-only audit so those transitions remain visible.Prompt To Fix With AI
Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Caretaker check at 4925f37: confirmed, but the filtering predates this PR and only diagnostic evidence is lost. The new moving audit runs the existing collector with
reportOnly(FullFlowUITests.swift:327), and AccessibilityAudit.swift:118-131 drops findings seen fewer than twice. A defect that clears before the second pass, six seconds later, leaves no AUDIT line. Keeping two sightings as the failure rule is deliberate (lines 17-28). Report-only mode could still attach findings seen once. Non-blocking for this PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That distinction makes sense. Keeping the two-sighting threshold for failures is deliberate, while retaining single-sighting findings only in
reportOnlywould improve diagnostic visibility without changing pass/fail behavior. Since the filtering predates this PR and the impact is limited to optional evidence, I agree this is non-blocking and can be tracked as follow-up hardening.