You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@hartz0 has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.
Hi, I'd like to work on this issue. I'll review the existing implementation, make the necessary changes, and test the solution to ensure it works as expected. Thank you
Congratulations, @hartz0! 🎉 Your application was accepted by the repo's maintainers, and the issue is due on October 22, 2026.
🧑💻 @hartz0: Please resolve the issue such that the repo's maintainers have enough time to review your contribution before the due date. You'll earn Points for completing the issue on-time, which will make you eligible for a share of the Stellar Wave Program's reward pool.
Warning
When opening a PR, please link it to this issue to ensure it gets tracked accurately. Points are awarded when this issue is marked as completed by the maintainer.
🤠 Repo maintainers: Please keep an eye on the contributor's progress and review their work before the due date. You can manage this issue, including adjusting its complexity and points, here.
😎 @hartz0: You earned 200 Points for completing this issue! Once the Wave's rewards are finalized, you'll be eligible for a percentage of the Wave's reward pool based on the percentage of total points you've earned. Learn more here. You can also Leave a review to share your experience working on this issue.
🧑💻 Repo maintainers: How'd the contributor do? Leave a review to share your experience working with them.
Activity
Ranjeet2063 commentedon Oct 17, 2026
Hello maintainers,
I reviewed the requirements for "Test batch operations atomicity" and would like to work on this implementation.
Technical Implementation Outline:
Please assign this issue to me. I will submit a clean, well-tested, and production-ready PR promptly!
hartz0 commentedon Oct 17, 2026
@hartz0 has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.
ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @hartz0 to this issue.
drips-wave commentedon Oct 17, 2026
Congratulations, @hartz0! 🎉 Your application was accepted by the repo's maintainers, and the issue is due on October 22, 2026.
🧑💻 @hartz0: Please resolve the issue such that the repo's maintainers have enough time to review your contribution before the due date. You'll earn Points for completing the issue on-time, which will make you eligible for a share of the Stellar Wave Program's reward pool.
Warning
When opening a PR, please link it to this issue to ensure it gets tracked accurately. Points are awarded when this issue is marked as completed by the maintainer.
🤠 Repo maintainers: Please keep an eye on the contributor's progress and review their work before the due date. You can manage this issue, including adjusting its complexity and points, here.
🌊 Happy Wave 🌊
test: add test suites for batch atomicity, timeout/error handling, cu…
grantfox-oss commentedon Oct 19, 2026
🎉 This issue has been marked as completed on GrantFox!
@hartz0's PR #1149 was approved and merged by @Kingsman-99.
🏆 @hartz0: You earned 35 FoxPoints for this contribution! Your current tier: Explorer (379 total points). Track your full progress on GrantFox.
👏 Great work, @hartz0! Keep contributing to Stellar-split.
Merge pull request #1149 from hartz0/test/batch-timeout-currency-webh…
drips-wave commentedon Oct 19, 2026
This issue has been completed by @hartz0 as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th Wave 🥳
😎 @hartz0: You earned 200 Points for completing this issue! Once the Wave's rewards are finalized, you'll be eligible for a percentage of the Wave's reward pool based on the percentage of total points you've earned. Learn more here. You can also Leave a review to share your experience working on this issue.
🧑💻 Repo maintainers: How'd the contributor do? Leave a review to share your experience working with them.