Skip to content

Fix Workflow Index purity failure from naming bootstrap classification - #744

Merged
witbrock merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/workflow-index-ae643ee
Sep 17, 2026
Merged

witbrock merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/workflow-index-ae643ee

Conversation

@witbrock

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem and change

DGX's deferred workflow registry fails strict parity with workflow_purity_regression: the naming workflow added in #645 uses the standard startup seed bootstrap, but its bootstrap module was omitted from the explicit seed-support paths. All 109 live workflows were represented and graph-complete; the sole blocking counter was this path misclassification.

Recognise only the conversation-naming bootstrap module. Runtime naming still resolves the published Vontology graph. The zero-failure baseline, strict policy, and runtime seed-import checks are unchanged. A negative test keeps a runtime naming service outside the permitted paths; the naming bootstrap test now proves a customised live prompt survives and the existing graph is not republished.

Validation and release decision

60 targeted tests passed across naming, seed authority, purity reports and registry parity (one new fixture-path error corrected and its suite rerun). Static purity reports zero blocking increases; existing line-count advisories remain visible. git diff --check passes. Merge decision changes: ready for this bounded Tier 1 correction; live deployment acceptance will require parity read-back, index readiness and a representative discovery query.

Native task: #V#task_agent_ae643ee9655b975a171b94478b450119. No federation/import changes or baseline refresh. Separate missing testing-substrate types observed in operator diagnostics are outside this fix.

@witbrock
witbrock merged commit aaaaf5b into main Sep 17, 2026
2 checks passed
@witbrock
witbrock deleted the fix/workflow-index-ae643ee branch September 17, 2026 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant