Skip to content

docs(llms): cut Linux-with-Codex from the own-agent line (TASK-016) - #2862

Merged
lilyshen0722 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
folio/task-016-llms-linux
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

lilyshen0722 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
folio/task-016-llms-linux

Conversation

@lilyshen0722

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

TASK-016. Lily's ruling (pod 93400, 10-27): we can't walk Codex on Linux this week, because D111 is moving every Codex path off GPT. This PR cuts the llms.txt line that says own-agent @mentions work on Linux with Codex. The line keeps its Mac-only sentence. Restoring the Linux claim needs a dated walk.

Changes

  • frontend/public/llms.txt (line 7): drops ", and on Linux with Codex" from the own-agent line. Now reads "This works on a Mac with either tool."
  • frontend/src/__tests__/llmsTxt.test.ts: the runtime test asserts the Mac-only sentence and that Linux with Codex does not appear. The comment cites TASK-016.

Scope

  • Docs copy only, one Tier 0 PR. No code paths change.
  • The in-app BYO copy was already narrowed to Mac in docs(byo): TASK-012 claim table + OpenCode version fix #2783, so it is not touched here.
  • Stale test comments that still mention Linux with Codex (V2AgentBYOFromCard.test.tsx:190, V2AgentBYOListenSnippet.test.tsx:200) are comments only. They are left for a follow-up.

Verification

  • CI=true npx jest --watchAll=false src/__tests__/llmsTxt.test.ts on Node 22: 6/6 pass.
  • Grep: no remaining Linux with Codex in frontend/public or docs-site.

Written by folio, a Commonly agent — https://commonly.me/v2/pods/6aaee2af1e8446ae11fb1457

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Codex on Linux has no dated walk, and D111 is moving every Codex path off
GPT this week. llms.txt keeps the Mac-only sentence. Restoring the Linux
claim needs a dated walk first.

Written by folio, a Commonly agent — https://commonly.me/v2/pods/6aaee2af1e8446ae11fb1457

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: folio <WyJmb2xpbyIsImRlZmF1bHQiXQ@agents.commonly.invalid>
Agent-Model: claude/claude-haiku-5-5/high
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info
Run configuration
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1db54b9 and 8a4ac5b.

Files selected for processing: 2
  • frontend/public/llms.txt
  • frontend/src/__tests__/llmsTxt.test.ts

Limit details: You’ve used all 10 included reviews currently available.

Walkthrough

The connection description now states Mac support for Claude Code and Codex. The runtime-coverage test checks that wording and rejects a claim of Linux support for Codex.

Changes: Platform support statement

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update platform claim and coverage test
frontend/public/llms.txt, frontend/src/__tests__/llmsTxt.test.ts
The description limits the stated support to Mac for Claude Code and Codex. The test checks the Mac wording and rejects “Linux with Codex.”

Priority: Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 8a4ac

This documentation-only update is consistent and ready to merge.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 4
Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title clearly identifies the documentation change: removing the Linux-with-Codex claim from the own-agent line.
Description check Passed The description accurately explains the documentation and test updates, scope, rationale, and verification results.
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Usage-based review receipt

  • Mode: Continue automatically
  • Reviewed files: 2
  • Waived: $0.50 (charged $0.00)
  • View usage details

Note

This review exceeded your plan’s limits and used usage-based reviews—free during trial, billed after paid activation unless disabled. Manage usage-based reviews.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@lilyshen0722
lilyshen0722 added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 27, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 3821511 Oct 27, 2026
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant