Repository navigation
Translate llama and trader llama coat variants - #496
Open
guhlutions wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
guhlutions wants to merge 1 commit into
guhlutions wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A Bedrock Realm sent
VARIANT = 3for a llama. ViaBedrock logged an unsupported variant and the Java client kept the default coat.Bedrock and Java use the same IDs for the four llama coat colors. Forward the valid IDs as Java's llama variant metadata for llamas and trader llamas. Unknown values fall back to the creamy coat and log a warning.
Tested all four colors, repeated updates, and invalid IDs for both entity types. Verified the metadata for Java 26.3 and through ViaBackwards to Java 1.21.4.