Skip to content

ci: configure Dependabot for Bun lockfile - #29

Merged
abla86 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/dependabot-bun-lockfile
Oct 12, 2026
Merged

abla86 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/dependabot-bun-lockfile

Conversation

@abla86

@abla86 abla86 commented Oct 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Problem

The scheduled Dependabot run fails because this repository has bun.lock, not an npm/yarn/pnpm lockfile. The log explicitly says npm_and_yarn cannot update this project and recommends the bun ecosystem.

Change

Switch the root dependency update target from npm to bun. Keep the GitHub Actions update target unchanged.

Validation

The existing CodeSentinel CI and security checks will run on this configuration change; the next Dependabot schedule can then validate dependency updates against bun.lock.

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 12, 2026 07:09
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-12T07:12:18.425844Z 19ea5e8 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 19ea5e87e7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/dependabot.yml
version: 2
updates:
- package-ecosystem: "npm"
- package-ecosystem: "bun"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Use a Dependabot-compatible Bun lockfile

This activates the Bun updater against a bun.lock whose lockfileVersion is 2; hosted Dependabot currently rejects versions above 1 rather than updating them (#15896). Consequently the weekly root update job will fail with DependencyFileNotSupported and no dependency PRs will be opened. Regenerate or restamp the lockfile to a supported version before enabling this ecosystem.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The configuration matches the repository’s supported Bun lockfile and preserves existing GitHub Actions updates.

0 open findings

What changed in this PR

Updates Dependabot to manage the repository’s Bun dependencies correctly.

Changes:

  • Switches the root package ecosystem from npm to Bun.
  • Leaves GitHub Actions updates unchanged.
File Description
.github/​dependabot.yml Targets bun.lock using the Bun ecosystem.

🧠 Review effort: Balanced


💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@abla86
abla86 merged commit aba7c30 into main Oct 12, 2026
10 checks passed
@abla86
abla86 deleted the fix/dependabot-bun-lockfile branch October 12, 2026 07:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants