Repository navigation
docs: restructure the README and list each backend's packages - #157
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.
An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing. Review the Copilot code review billing settings.
|
Self-review: docs only. Each package was checked with apt-cache policy and dpkg -S against the binaries the backend's doctor check requires (kbuildsycoca6 -> libkf6service-bin, kscreen-doctor -> libkscreen-bin, xrdb -> x11-xserver-utils, gsettings -> libglib2.0-bin). The cosmic-comp URLs and sha256 sums match scripts/cosmic_probe.Dockerfile. |
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: 054cb473-2556-42b6-b3d0-0106d696ad28) |
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: 05d62d80-06d3-4a4e-b745-54f8737146f4) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.
An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing. Review the Copilot code review billing settings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.
An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing. Review the Copilot code review billing settings.
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: 8fb2685e-20e4-4d4a-9df3-0628889edaa6) |
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: ce58d568-b155-404e-8863-b3fd300d1674) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.
An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing. Review the Copilot code review billing settings.
|
Self-review at 19f1712: every fact from the old README is kept (diffed section by section); anchors in the nav and cross-links resolve; the gallery PNG is 85 KB. assets/viewer-website-qa.png stays in the repo in case anything links to it directly. |
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: eeed71ee-71fe-4964-a537-d90aa4e761fd) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.
An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing. Review the Copilot code review billing settings.
|
Revuto reached its 3-round cap on this PR. Its only finding (gate the cosmic-comp install on checksum verification) is fixed in 741fa32 and tested on both paths; all review threads are resolved and CI is green. |
README rework for scanning:
Checked rendered on GitHub at 1400x1050 in light and dark themes.
Note
Low Risk
Documentation-only README restructuring with a minor cargo install version example update; no code or security behavior changes.
Overview
README overhaul for faster scanning, with no runtime or API changes.
The hero now uses centered HTML, an npm badge, anchor nav, and
assets/backends.png(six backends) instead of the old viewer QA screenshot. Install is three steps (system packages, binary viainstall.sh/ npm / cargo, MCP registration); Codex/install.shdetail lives in a collapsible.Desktop backends get a comparison table (session, stack, scale, GPU), a per-backend Ubuntu package list, scale/coordinate notes, and per-backend notes in
<details>. Security is renamed and split into boundary ownership, what sandboxed apps see (with a GitHub warning on X11 vs Wayland), and terminal cleanup. Validation probes, CDP attach, group-drop requirements, and browser-session dogfood are consolidated into tables or collapsibles. The cargo pin example updates v0.2.0 → v0.5.1; other facts are reorganized, not rewritten.Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 741fa32. Configure here.