Skip undeterministic deployment verification

[hiletmis]

Closes #461

Problem

verify-deployments fails on both Filecoin chains:

Error: filecoin GnosisSafeWithoutProxy creation tx could not be fetched
Error: filecoin-testnet GnosisSafeWithoutProxy creation tx could not be fetched

All contracts on these two chains are deployed undeterministically, so they are verified
through their creation transactions. Filecoin's Ethereum JSON-RPC implementation only
indexes recent messages, which means eth_getTransactionByHash returns null for the
deployment transactions and verification cannot proceed.

This is a property of the chains' RPC retention rather than a problem with the
deployments themselves.

Solution

Add skippedChainAliasesInUndeterministicDeploymentVerification to scripts/constants.ts,
following the existing skip-list convention in that file. For the listed chains,
verify-deployments confirms that contract code exists at the deployment address instead
of fetching and comparing the creation transaction.

[bdrhn9]

I don't think this PR addresses issue #461. Issue #461 asks for the opposite: maintaining an allowlist of chains that were deployed non-deterministically. This is because non-deterministic deployments are normally validated using this else condition, and CI passes. For example, ronin, mantle-sepolia-testnet, and taiko have non-deterministic deployments for the OwnableCallForwarder, AccessControlRegistry, and Api3ServerV1 contracts.

For this PR, it's probably better to keep the behavior as-is but have it only say "Skip verify-deployments on Filecoin, whose RPC does not index historical transactions". We should then create a follow-up PR, maybe with a function written specifically for this chain, to verify the contract code, probably by calling eth_getCode and checking the immutable parts of the code. Otherwise, skipping verification completely isn't acceptable, imo.

[bdrhn9]

The else if body is identical to the if body, except the two error strings use undeterministic instead of deterministic. I'd suggest the following implementation to reduce duplication:

const deployedDeterministically = deployment.address === expectedDeterministicDeploymentAddress;
if (deployedDeterministically || skippedChainAliasesInUndeterministicDeploymentVerification.includes(network)) {
  const deploymentType = deployedDeterministically ? 'deterministic' : 'undeterministic';
  const goFetchContractCode = await go(async () => provider.getCode(deployment.address), goAsyncOptions);
  if (!goFetchContractCode.success || !goFetchContractCode.data) {
    throw new Error(`${network} ${contractName} (${deploymentType}) contract code could not be fetched`);
  }
  if (goFetchContractCode.data === '0x') {
    throw new Error(`${network} ${contractName} (${deploymentType}) contract code does not exist`);
  }
} else {