chore: upgrade llama.cpp from b11236 to b11237

[bernardladenthin]

Summary

• Bumps the pinned llama.cpp from b11236 to b11237 (llama/CMakeLists.txt, README.md, CLAUDE.md, LlamaCppVersion.java).
• The range contains one upstream commit, #29603 (ggml/src/ggml-openvino/ggml-openvino.cpp, +22 lines). The OpenVINO backend now reports views with an unaligned batch stride as unsupported, so the scheduler falls back instead of computing them wrong.
• This project's side needs only the version change: no API change, no patch-target file in the range, and no upstream workflow change.

Test plan

• No patch-target file changes in b11236...b11237, so all nine patches apply unchanged
• CI is green on this branch
• Docs updated (docs/history/llama-cpp-breaking-changes.md)

Related issues / PRs

Follows #464 (b11222 → b11236).

Checklist

• My commits follow Conventional Commits
• No security-sensitive changes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01QSXAwbXqx9u5xsMArMvgT8

---

Generated by Claude Code

[bernardladenthin]

Heads-up: the two Verify GPG signing key checks ("… (no secrets printed)" and "… — Gradle/BouncyCastle path …") will fail on this PR. They read the signing key from the maven-central environment, and those secrets are not available on PR branches. They fail the same way on every PR (see #464, #461). This PR changes only the llama.cpp pin and docs, and touches no signing or workflow code. There is no fix to port; they pass on main / release dispatches.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[bernardladenthin]

claude-review failed here, but not because of this PR. The action's Claude call returned is_error: true after 286 ms with total_cost_usd: 0 and empty modelUsage, so no model turn ran and nothing was reviewed. It is the same action/API-side failure seen on #461, and it is independent of this diff, which changes only the llama.cpp pin and docs. There is no fix to port from here. I don't have the means to re-run the job; a manual re-run of claude-review should pass once the action's API call succeeds.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud