Describe the bug
According to the docs --n_workers is a valid option of birdnet_analyzer.analyze. According to the command output it isn't.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
python3 -m birdnet_analyzer.analyze --n_workers 4 example
Error:
usage: __main__.py [-h] [-o OUTPUT] [--fmin FMIN] [--fmax FMAX] [--lat LAT]
[--lon LON] [--week WEEK] [--sf_thresh SF_THRESH]
[--slist SLIST] [--sensitivity SENSITIVITY]
[--overlap OVERLAP] [--audio_speed AUDIO_SPEED]
[-t THREADS] [--min_conf MIN_CONF] [-l LOCALE]
[-b BATCH_SIZE]
[--rtype {table,audacity,kaleidoscope,csv} [{table,audacity,kaleidoscope,csv} ...]]
[--additional_columns {lat,lon,week,overlap,sensitivity,min_conf,species_list,model} [{lat,lon,week,overlap,sensitivity,min_conf,species_list,model} ...]]
[--combine_results] [-c CLASSIFIER]
[--skip_existing_results] [--top_n TOP_N]
[--merge_consecutive MERGE_CONSECUTIVE] [--use_perch]
INPUT
__main__.py: error: unrecognized arguments: --n_workers
Expected behavior
Using the specified number of workers.
Screenshots
N/A
Desktop (please complete the following information):
N/A
Additional context
I'm using birdnet_analyzer.analyze through Docker (I build the Docker image of the v2.4.0 tag).
Might be similar to #966, where the docs should be fixed since it should not publicize things that are not available in the latest public release.
Describe the bug
According to the docs
--n_workersis a valid option ofbirdnet_analyzer.analyze. According to the command output it isn't.To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Error:
Expected behavior
Using the specified number of workers.
Screenshots
N/A
Desktop (please complete the following information):
N/A
Additional context
I'm using
birdnet_analyzer.analyzethrough Docker (I build the Docker image of thev2.4.0tag).Might be similar to #966, where the docs should be fixed since it should not publicize things that are not available in the latest public release.