ci(review): show the full Claude Code Review output

[Jamie-BitFlight]

Follow-up to #313. That change made the review prompt pass --comment and allowed the comment tools, but no review comment has appeared since.

Observation

On #312 at 2edc05d (job 111192847760), the action ran with the fixed workflow and the comment tools allowed. It reported success, 2 turns, 4.7 s, $0.094, 0 permission denials, then No buffered inline comments. The log says: "Running Claude Code via SDK (full output hidden for security)... enable show_full_output: true in your workflow file for full output." So the run's conclusion is not visible, and the cause of the missing comments is unknown.

On #324 (stacked on #312's branch, which is behind main) the action was skipped with "Workflow validation failed ... identical content to the version on the repository's default branch". That is expected for a PR whose workflow file differs from main's, and retargeting to main resolves it.

Change

One input on the action step: show_full_output: true. The input exists in the action's input list in the job log ("show_full_output": "false").

Limits

• This PR's own review run will be skipped by the same workflow validation, because the file differs from main. The output cannot be seen until this merges and the review runs on another PR.
• Cause of the missing comments: unknown. This change only makes it visible. A follow-up change depends on what the log shows.
• With the flag on, the job log shows tool output. The log is readable by anyone who can read this repository's Actions logs. The run has read-only repository access plus pull-requests: write.

Validation

• Parsed the workflow with PyYAML: show_full_output is a sibling of claude_args, and the claude_args block is unchanged.
• uv run prek run --files .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml: all applicable hooks passed, including the workflow linter.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01K5rAHJfvZyEEaUQghV7hCQ

---

Generated by Claude Code

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: defaults
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: a88f00e6-1654-4dea-ae9f-e688c2932661

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

📊 Test Coverage Report

Coverage: 88.74%

📥 Coverage XML available as artifact: coverage-xml

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results

🔴 Regression detected — threshold: 30%

scan-clean

Metric	Base	Compare	Change
files_per_second	79.5 files/s	82.2 files/s	✅ +3.4%
scan_max_ms	13030.7 ms	12203.7 ms	✅ -6.3%
scan_mean_ms	12585.9 ms	12175.0 ms	✅ -3.3%
scan_min_ms	12280.2 ms	12139.2 ms	✅ -1.1%

scan-violations

Metric	Base	Compare	Change
files_per_second	93.6 files/s	97.0 files/s	✅ +3.6%
scan_max_ms	2195.9 ms	2113.8 ms	✅ -3.7%
scan_mean_ms	2147.9 ms	2072.6 ms	✅ -3.5%
scan_min_ms	2097.5 ms	2029.3 ms	✅ -3.3%

fix-violations

Metric	Base	Compare	Change
fix_files_per_second	145.2 files/s	148.8 files/s	✅ +2.5%
fix_max_ms	1395.1 ms	1354.1 ms	✅ -2.9%
fix_mean_ms	1384.7 ms	1350.7 ms	✅ -2.5%
fix_min_ms	1376.2 ms	1347.5 ms	✅ -2.1%

cpu

Metric	Base	Compare	Change
cpu_clean_mean_ms	0.3 ms	0.3 ms	✅ -0.5%
cpu_fix_mean_ms	0.8 ms	0.8 ms	✅ -1.4%
cpu_violations_mean_ms	0.3 ms	0.3 ms	➡️ +0.6%

import

Metric	Base	Compare	Change
import_package_max_ms	107.5 ms	227.4 ms	🔴 +111.5%
import_package_mean_ms	93.4 ms	132.9 ms	🔴 +42.3%
import_package_min_ms	83.6 ms	82.5 ms	✅ -1.3%
import_rules_max_ms	136.7 ms	248.1 ms	🔴 +81.5%
import_rules_mean_ms	135.3 ms	171.8 ms	➡️ +27.0%
import_rules_min_ms	133.3 ms	132.3 ms	✅ -0.7%

View benchmark history

_{Updated 2026-10-05 09:03 UTC}