Repository navigation
docs: acknowledge related systems and standards - #20
Merged
Merged
Conversation
aharvard
approved these changes
Oct 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
docs: acknowledge related systems and standards
Problem
The documentation explains GAP's records and lifecycle but does not collect related work. Readers lack a single place to find adjacent content-generation systems, provenance models, and attestation standards, or understand how their scope relates to GAP.
Changes
The page acknowledges related work without claiming endorsement, interoperability, priority, or direct influence on GAP's design. Possible integrations are distinguished from implemented behavior. Community documentation that remains unversioned is identified as such where applicable.
This is a documentation-only change. It adds no protocol requirements and changes no schemas, digest domains, examples, or demo behavior.
Verification
The following passed on the final commit,
6686234:pnpm docs:testpnpm --dir documentation typecheckpnpm docs:buildDOCS_BASE_URL=/governed-artifact-protocol/ pnpm docs:buildThe subpath build was reviewed locally at desktop and mobile sizes, with screenshots captured in both themes. Checked direct entry, sidebar placement, table of contents, ten entry headings, previous/next navigation, and mobile horizontal overflow.
All 21 original citation links returned HTTP 200 during research. The five GitHub references were subsequently pinned to reviewed commits, and all five pinned source documents were fetched successfully. All documentation checks passed again after pinning those references. The working tree is clean.