Drop the stale ENABLE_WATCHOS comment from the CI workflow#9
Conversation
build-macos-platforms is documented as gating the watchOS leg on an ENABLE_WATCHOS repo variable (citing SwiftPM #10188 / brightdigit.com#119), but no such gate exists in this workflow — nothing references vars.ENABLE_WATCHOS, and the watchOS row runs unconditionally alongside iOS and tvOS. Comment-only change; no step, action, or matrix row is touched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 50 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
build-macos-platformsis documented as gating the watchOS leg on anENABLE_WATCHOSrepo variable (citing SwiftPM #10188 / brightdigit.com#119). No such gate exists in this workflow — nothing referencesvars.ENABLE_WATCHOS, and the watchOS row runs unconditionally alongside iOS and tvOS.Comment-only change — no step, action, or matrix row is modified.
Found while auditing the CI template across the package fleet. The same stale comment was present in Contribute (brightdigit/Contribute#18), Plot, Files, Ink, SwiftTube, Spinetail, and all seven Wave 1 packages; this is the
Inkhalf of that sweep.🤖 Generated with Claude Code