Repository navigation
feat(desktop): prefer templates and generated creation drafts - #567
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Creation screens currently require users to type names, descriptions and acceptance items before proceeding. Local workspaces, employees, and projects/goals now offer editable template drafts so users can choose a starting point and confirm.
Confirmation uses the existing creation APIs. Role templates keep the existing budgets and permissions. Proposal application retains omitted or unchanged capability groups and their custom rules; explicit empty groups clear only that group. Advanced policy review opens only for actual changes. Request guards prevent duplicate submissions and stale callbacks; previously issued Agent turns retain their originating timeout.
Validation: latest-head full Node 24 checks on Ubuntu and macOS, CodeQL, dependency review, Scorecard, both staging/native Windows checks and unsigned installers, and cross-platform layout parity all passed. Local focused creation, lifecycle, parser and i18n checks passed. Browser QA used the real components with simulated bridge data, including template confirmation, readable generated candidates, and English light mode at 390px with zero visible text fields after selecting a project template.