[camara-release-automation]

Release Review: r3.2 rc

This PR finalizes the reviewable release content for the active snapshot.

Edit and review this PR before merging it into the release snapshot. After Codeowner and Release Management approval, merging this PR creates the draft release.

Release contents

API	Version	Status	Comparison target
webrtc-call-handling	0.4.0-rc.2	rc	0.4.0-rc.1
webrtc-events-subscriptions	0.3.0-rc.2	rc	0.3.0-rc.1
webrtc-registration	0.4.0-rc.2	rc	0.4.0-rc.1

Dependencies: Commonalities r4.4, ICM r4.2

Codeowner Actions

Tick each box once done. Ticking the last box — "The release is ready for Release Management review" — starts the Release Management review.

• Update the CHANGELOG

  What to do:

  • Copy all API-consumer-relevant changes from the provided list into the appropriate Breaking changes / Added / Changed / Fixed / Removed sections for each API. List breaking changes both in Breaking changes and in their normal change category.
  • Do not copy administrative, tooling-only, or internal maintenance changes unless they affect API consumers.
  • For each API, fill the CHANGELOG against the stated comparison target, following the release-type rules at the top of the CHANGELOG.

• Document deferred validation warnings (and hints)

  What to do:

  • Check the CAMARA Validation comment on this PR for warnings and hints.
  • For each warning you do not fix, document it in an issue: include a copy of the validation summary line(s) and the reason the fix is deferred.
  • Document in the same way any validation hint that is applicable to the API and needs to be fixed later.
  • You may group several findings into one issue or split them across issues — either is fine.
  • List the documenting issue(s) in a comment on this PR.
  • Note: documenting deferred warnings is optional but recommended for alpha pre-releases, and mandatory for rc pre-releases and public releases.

• The release is ready for Release Management review

  Check that:

  • All mandatory release assets for the declared status(es) are present (see the table below "Required release assets per API status" by expanding the arrow);
  • API documentation and test cases are adequate for the target status.

  Tick this box to confirm readiness and to start the Release Management review.

Release Management Actions

The following actions and checks are done by a Release Management reviewer before approving the PR:

• Assign the Release Management reviewer(s) as assignee(s) of this PR
• CHANGELOG follows the release documentation rules
• Breaking changes are documented and version updates follow SemVer rules
• Mandatory release assets are present for each API according to its status
• All remaining validation warnings are documented in issues and the reasons for deferral are defensible
• Content findings needing a main PR are collected as sub-issues of one issue titled Release r3.2 review findings (see Recording review findings)

Required release assets per API status

Nr	Asset	alpha	rc	initial public	stable public
1	Release Plan	M	M	M	M
2	API Definition(s)	M	M	M	M
3	Commonalities compliance	O	M	M	M
4	API Documentation	M	M	M	M
5	User Stories	O	O	O	M
6	Test Cases (basic)	O	M	M	M
7	Test Cases (enhanced)	O	O	O	M
8	API Description	O	O	M	M

M = Mandatory, O = Optional — Full documentation

Valid next actions for codeowners

• Merge this PR when all Codeowner Actions and Release Management Actions are complete and the required approvals are present — creates the draft release
• Use /discard-snapshot <reason> in the Release Issue to discard this snapshot, return to planned, and update content on main

---

Snapshot: r3.2-fc378cf

[camara-validation]

CAMARA Validation — PASS

0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 hints | Profile: standard

View full results

[deepakjaiswal1]

LGTM

[stroncoso]

Thanks @deepakjaiswal1 for the approval, but I need to update the CHANGELOG first! 😅

This PR was created by the automation bot, and the only approval that matters is the release-management_reviewers, and it will be triggered once I update the CHANGELOG (no deferred warnings now).

I will update here when ready.

EDIT: Anyway, the approval is nice to show that we are all agree to release! 🙌

[stroncoso]

Deferred validation findings

CAMARA Validation: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 hints — no deferred validation findings to document.

Known open issues (deferred, non-blocking for this rc)

The following r3.1 review findings remain open, tracked under #213, and are deferred to a later release before the first public release:

• Align use of CAMARA common schemas #230 — Align use of CAMARA common schemas: local schemas are functionally correct; adopting the common ones (incl. the CAMARA_event_common.yaml alignment) is partly breaking and planned for the next rc. The issue itself states it can be done in the next rc or anytime before v1.0.0.
• Update names for more clarity #231 — Update names for more clarity: renaming of resources and schemas (e.g. /sessions → /registrations); cosmetic but breaking, not blocking the current release as stated in the issue.
• Clarify user identification and resource access across the three APIs #233 — Clarify user identification and resource access across the three APIs: requires applying the Design Guide Appendix A and resource access rules consistently, including breaking changes; planned for the next rc, before the next public release.

None of these are flagged by CAMARA Validation or block the rc release assets.

[stroncoso]

LGTM

[stroncoso]

@camaraproject/release-management_reviewers , any update on the release review?

Thanks