Skip to content

Add Project Structure Documentation to README #346

Open

Description

@Venkatkalyan21

Problem

The README.md currently lacks a clear project structure section that shows the organization of files and directories. This makes it difficult for new contributors to understand where different components are located and how the project is organized.

Proposed Solution

Add a comprehensive "Project Structure" section to the README.md that visualizes the directory tree and explains the purpose of each major folder/file.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a "📁 Project Structure" section in README.md (preferably after Features and before Contributing)
  • Include a visual directory tree showing main folders and key files
  • Add brief descriptions for each major directory/component
  • Use proper markdown formatting with code blocks
  • Ensure the structure matches the actual repository organization
  • Keep it concise but informative (not every single file, just important ones)

Suggested Format

## 📁 Project Structure

jarvis/
├── .streamlit/ # Streamlit configuration files
├── models/ # ML/DL model implementations
│ ├── BrainTumorModel/ # Brain tumor detection
│ ├── DiabetesModel/ # Diabetes prediction
│ └── ... # Other model modules
├── utils/ # Helper functions and utilities
│ ├── authentication.py # Auth logic
│ └── voice_handler.py # Voice command processing
├── ui/ # UI components (if applicable)
├── assets/ # Images, demos, screenshots
├── app.py # Main Streamlit application
├── requirements.txt # Python dependencies
├── secrets.example.toml # Template for API keys/secrets
├── .gitignore # Git ignore rules
├── LICENSE # Project license
└── README.md # Project documentation

Activity

  1. github-actions commented on Oct 26, 2025

    @github-actions

    Thank you for creating this issue! We'll look into it as soon as possible. Your contributions are highly appreciated! 😊
    For further communication, join our discord server https://discord.gg/tSqtvHUJzE.

  2. Avdhesh-Varshney commented on Oct 26, 2025

    @Avdhesh-Varshney
    Collaborator

    For this @Venkatkalyan21, You have to first contribute something meaningful in this project.
    So to aware about the project properly.

  3. Venkatkalyan21 commented on Oct 27, 2025

    @Venkatkalyan21
    Author

    I actually raised an issue for improving the README — just wanted to start by understanding the project better before contributing further.

  4. Avdhesh-Varshney commented on Oct 27, 2025

    @Avdhesh-Varshney
    Collaborator

    Yes, But for this contribution, You have to contribute something in codebase.

  5. Om7035 commented on Oct 27, 2025

    @Om7035
    Contributor

    should i work on it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    question❓Further information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions