Skip to content

🤖 refactor: move workflow run attention into WorkflowRunAttention - #7666

Merged
ThomasK33 merged 2 commits into
refactor/task-service-pure-helpersfrom
refactor/task-workflow-run-attention
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

ThomasK33 merged 2 commits into
refactor/task-service-pure-helpersfrom
refactor/task-workflow-run-attention

Conversation

@ThomasK33

@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Moves TaskService's owed workflow terminal wakes (pendingWorkflowRunAttention) and the per-run settlement chain (workflowRunSettlementByRun) into a new WorkflowRunAttention class (workflowRunAttention.ts). taskService.ts: 22,382 → 22,224 lines.

Background

PR 2 to 5 of the TaskService split stack (#7665 is PR 1). Each layer moves one group of TaskService state and the methods that own it into a plain class that TaskService builds in its constructor. The rules are the same in every layer: public methods stay on TaskService as one-line facades, methods that tests spy on or patch stay reachable on TaskService and the new class calls them through call-time closures, and tests that cast a moved field change only the cast target. No behaviour changes.

Implementation

  • Moved unchanged: queueWorkflowRunAttention, markWorkflowRunTerminalAttentionSettled, settleWorkflowRunTerminalAttention, clearWorkflowRunDowngradeSettlement. The two public ones keep TaskService facades (tools/task_await, tools/workflow_resume, WorkflowService and turnRequestBuilder call them).
  • The sweep, noteWorkflowRunTerminalAttention and drainTerminalAttention stay on TaskService. The drain uses three accessors: queuedRunIds, dropOwner and dropRun.
  • Deps are two closures, sessionsDir and terminalAttentionStore, so a test that swaps the store still works.
  • The class stays separate from workspaceWorkflowRuns.ts, which caches sidebar run activity for WorkspaceService.
  • Tests: the 7 queue seeds in taskService.test.ts and queuedWorkflowRunAttention in the shared harness now cast workflowRunAttention.pendingWorkflowRunAttention. The new workflowRunAttention.test.ts (14 tests) covers queue dedupe, settle write order, a failed marker write, a newer generation, an unreadable run, and that settlements of one run do not overlap.

Validation

  • bun test on taskService, workspaceTurnManager, workflows, tools and the new file: all pass (on this layer and on the stack top, 4,898 tests).
  • make static-check, make lint-eslint, make crap-check (moved methods are CC 2 to 6), make dry-check: pass.
  • Mutation on the new class: 18 killed, 2 equivalent (?? → || on a Set or Promise).

Risks

Low. The settlement chain and the settle write order move as one unit, with the same statements.


Generated with xum • Model: anthropic:claude-opus-5-5 • Thinking: high • Cost: $53.33

Move-only. The in-memory workflow terminal wake queue
(pendingWorkflowRunAttention), the per-run settlement chain
(workflowRunSettlementByRun) and their methods (queueWorkflowRunAttention,
markWorkflowRunTerminalAttentionSettled, settleWorkflowRunTerminalAttention,
clearWorkflowRunDowngradeSettlement) move into a plain WorkflowRunAttention
class. TaskService builds it with call-time closures for sessionsDir and
terminalAttentionStore, keeps the two public methods as one-line facades,
and the drain reaches the queue through queuedRunIds/dropOwner/dropRun.

Tests that seed the queue through a cast now point at
workflowRunAttention.pendingWorkflowRunAttention. The new class gets its
own unit tests with a fake store.
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 added this pull request to stack #7670 October 27, 2026 07:59
@ThomasK33 ThomasK33 changed the title refactor/task workflow run attention 🤖 refactor: move workflow run attention into WorkflowRunAttention Oct 27, 2026
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2026 08:00
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T08:02:50.646045Z a67670b Manual request
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T08:03:23.975630Z a67670b Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit: a67670bdb1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a67670bdb1

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟢 e2e stories (Haiku): 14 passed

22 agent steps · 7 replayed from cache · 15 model calls · 46.3k tokens (28% cached)
Spend: $0.08 of the $1.00 cap (proxy ledger)

All 14 tests in 9 files
Test Agent Time
🟢 chatRestart.e2e.ts · 1 passed 1 step · 1 call 5.5s
🟢 a chat survives a restart of the server 1 step · 1 call 5.5s
🟢 compaction.e2e.ts · 1 passed 1 step · 1 call 7.8s
🟢 /compact replaces the old chat with a summary 1 step · 1 call 7.8s
🟢 pluginTrustRestart.e2e.ts · 1 passed 4 steps · 2 calls 9.8s
🟢 a trusted plugin hook stays trusted after the server restarts 4 steps · 2 calls 9.8s
🟢 settingsRoundTrip.e2e.ts · 1 passed 2 steps · 1 call 8.5s
🟢 a chat survives trips through Settings 2 steps · 1 call 8.5s
🟢 sidebarPerWorkspace.e2e.ts · 1 passed 4 steps · 1 call 4.2s
🟢 a new workspace starts with its right sidebar collapsed while another keeps it open 4 steps · 1 call 4.2s
🟢 smoke.e2e.ts · 1 passed 2 steps · 1 call 2.5s
🟢 the agent opens the playground workspace 2 steps · 1 call 2.5s
🟢 streamErrors.e2e.ts · 1 passed 1 step · 1 call 6.6s
🟢 stream errors show in the chat, and the chat recovers 1 step · 1 call 6.6s
🟢 todoNudge.e2e.ts · 1 passed 1 step · 1 call 4.0s
🟢 the agent finishes open TODO items after the turn-end nudge 1 step · 1 call 4.0s
🟢 touchAlignment.e2e.ts · 6 passed 6 steps · 6 calls 20.0s
🟢 the Settings close button is level with the title on a touch screen 390px wide 1 step · 1 call 3.8s
🟢 the Settings close button is level with the title on a touch screen 768px wide 1 step · 1 call 3.3s
🟢 Backup settings checkboxes are small and level with their labels on a touch phone 1 step · 1 call 3.8s
🟢 the heartbeat checkbox is small and level with its label on a touch phone 1 step · 1 call 3.2s
🟢 a reply's model and time stay on one line on a touch phone 1 step · 1 call 3.1s
🟢 the workspace actions menu stays on the title row on a touch phone 1 step · 1 call 2.8s

e2e 0.20.0 · 1m 12s · web · run artifacts

🟢 e2e Electron stories (Haiku): 3 passed

3 agent steps · 3 model calls · 8.0k tokens (32% cached)
Spend: $0.01 of the $1.00 cap (proxy ledger)

All 3 tests in 3 files
Test Agent Time
🟢 electron/deepLink.e2e.ts · 1 passed 1 step · 1 call 5.9s
🟢 a deep link of a second launch starts a chat in the running app 1 step · 1 call 5.9s
🟢 electron/menuBar.e2e.ts · 1 passed 1 step · 1 call 5.5s
🟢 the workspace menu bar is the desktop title bar 1 step · 1 call 5.5s
🟢 electron/smoke.e2e.ts · 1 passed 1 step · 1 call 4.8s
🟢 Xum Electron opens the playground workspace 1 step · 1 call 4.8s

e2e 0.20.0 · 18.5s · electron · run artifacts

🟢 e2e agent repros (Haiku): no tests selected

Spend: $0.00 of the $1.00 cap (proxy ledger)

e2e 0.20.0 · 5.3s · 2 targets (web, phone) · run artifacts

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 27, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9ef2e5a Oct 27, 2026
78 of 98 checks passed
@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 deleted the refactor/task-workflow-run-attention branch October 27, 2026 09:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant