Repository navigation
fix(feature-ideation): re-dispatch only for authors with write access - #663
Conversation
Sync the redispatch job with the combsmith/.github template. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
Walkthrough
Merge Risk:
|
Dev-Lead — waiting on PR blockers (intent: review-changes)PR: #663 |
|
Note @don-petry I reviewed this PR and no code changes were needed, but I can't mark it done yet: required checks |
|
|
No description provided. |
|
Codex code review could not complete due to account usage limits. No actionable code findings to address. |
|
Codex account usage limit reached — operational notice only. No code changes needed. Review can be retried after upgrading account or adding credits. |
Dev-Lead — fix-bot-comment (no-changes)Agent reasoning |
|
No description provided. |
Dev-Lead — fix-reviews (no-changes)Agent reasoning |



Updates the
redispatchjob of.github/workflows/feature-ideation.ymlto the current template in combsmith/.github (#1447, #1452). Only that job and its trigger comment change.project_context, the schedule and the channel pin are untouched.actions: write. The personal token is no longer referenced.Verified live on combsmith/.github: a maintainer's Idea produced one enhancement comment, and an Idea from an account without write access started no run.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
Problem
See the linked issue.
Risk
Medium — changes GitHub Actions workflow behavior, which is exercised only post-merge; verify via the affected workflow runs.
Test plan
No test files were added or updated. Verification:
bash scripts/dev-lead-lint.sh(shellcheck --severity=warning) ran pre-commit; the existing CI (bats + lint) guards the change.Rollback
Revert this PR. No non-revertible side effects (no tags, migrations, or external state).
Monitoring
Watch the affected workflow run(s) in the Actions tab and this PR's Lint check for regressions.