Update solvers.md#629
Conversation
Changed language per Odran's instructions.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 56 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocumentation rewrite of the Solvers introduction clarifies that solvers are independent bonded participants competing to generate the greatest surplus for user intents. The "How Solvers Work" section explains ERC-20 approval delegation through the vault relayer and settlement contract verification, with emphasis that solvers do not receive direct token approvals. ChangesSolvers Documentation Clarification
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/cow-protocol/concepts/introduction/solvers.md`:
- Line 11: The intro paragraph contains a duplicated dangling fragment "`through
an`" that leaves the sentence incomplete; remove the trailing fragment and
either end the previous sentence after "users" or complete it to a single
coherent clause (e.g., "Solvers are bonded third parties that execute trades on
behalf of users through an off-chain relayer.") Update the sentence in
docs/cow-protocol/concepts/introduction/solvers.md to remove the broken fragment
and ensure the paragraph reads as one complete statement.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 7863c15e-fbd0-43f0-b7ce-10e3562c44cd
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/cow-protocol/concepts/introduction/solvers.md
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Changed language per Odran's instructions.
Description
Changes
Summary by CodeRabbit